Browse Cases

Western District of Washington

The judge in 700 Edgewater Development, LLC v. Zurich American Insurance Company recused from the case in the Western District of Washington. The recusal likely stems from a conflict of interest or impartiality concern. The case will be reassigned to a different judge for further proceedings.

Western District of Washington

The Western District of Washington dismissed United National Insurance Company v. Joe Tex Xpress LLC as a duplicate of case 5122. A stipulation of dismissal was filed, confirming the resolution of the dispute between the parties. The dismissal ends all claims in this docket without further litigation.

Southern District of New York

In the case Brent v. My Goals Solutions Inc., docket number 25-cv-03584, the parties are engaged in litigation involving claims brought by Brent against My Goals Solutions Inc. The case details are limited, with the available document being a letter filed in the court record. Without additional substantive filings or

Southern District of New York

The case titled Dharry v. 60th Street, LLC et al, docket number 25-cv-06734, involves a dispute between the plaintiff, Dharry, and the defendant, 60th Street, LLC, along with other parties. While specific facts of the case are not detailed, the filing of a Proposed Case Management Plan indicates that the parties are

Southern District of New York

The case 1:22-cv-10625 Reif et al v. Republic of Austria et al involves plaintiffs Reif and others filing a lawsuit against the Republic of Austria and additional defendants. The docket includes a letter filed as document number 165, though specific details about the claims or procedural posture are not provided in

Southern District of New York

In the case titled The National Retirement Fund et al v. Domestic Linen Control Group, the plaintiffs, represented by the National Retirement Fund and associated parties, brought suit against Domestic Linen Control Group. The dispute centers on issues related to contractual obligations and financial responsibilities

Western District of Washington

The case titled Little Beings Holdings Pty Ltd et al v. SQE Incorporated, docket number 25-cv-02730, involves a dispute between the plaintiffs, Little Beings Holdings Pty Ltd and others, and the defendant, SQE Incorporated. While specific details of the claims are not provided, the presence of a consent letter and

Western District of Washington

In the case titled Katrinssonr et al v. State of Washington Department of Corrections et al, the plaintiffs have filed objections to a Report and Recommendation issued by the court. While specific details of the underlying claims are not provided, the objections indicate a procedural step in which the parties

Western District of Washington

The case 3:25-cv-05410 Barton v. Perkins involves a civil dispute between the parties Barton and Perkins. While specific details of the claims are not provided, the docket indicates ongoing proceedings in a federal court, with recent supplemental filings submitted to the court. The nature of the dispute and the relief

Western District of Washington

The case 3:26-cv-05333 Washington Wildlife First et al v. Susewind et al involves plaintiffs Washington Wildlife First and others bringing claims against defendants including Susewind. The docket references a Corporate/Diversity Disclosure Statement, which is a procedural filing typically required to inform the court

Central District of California

Couts Heating and Cooling Inc has filed a civil lawsuit against McCarthy Building Companies under docket number 25-cv-03174. The dispute arises between the two companies, which operate within the construction and building services industry. While specific claims and defenses have not been publicly disclosed, the

Central District of California

Anacapa Marine Street LLC has filed a civil lawsuit against Travelers Casualty Insurance, alleging that the insurer failed to fulfill its contractual obligations under an insurance policy. The dispute arises from Travelers Casualty Insurance's denial of coverage for certain damages claimed by Anacapa Marine Street

Central District of California

In the case 2:23-cv-02226 Tayler Ulmer v. StreetTeam Software, LLC, the plaintiff Tayler Ulmer has brought a lawsuit against StreetTeam Software, LLC. The case involves a dispute likely centered around contractual or business-related issues, as suggested by the parties involved. A recent development in the case

Central District of California

In the case of Adam Layne v. City of Hesperia et al, docket number 24-cv-01721, the parties are engaged in pretrial motions, including an in limine motion to exclude certain evidence. The motion aims to prevent specific information or testimony from being presented at trial, which could influence the jury's perception

Central District of California

In the case 2:22-cv-00047, plaintiffs Jeanene Popp, Luis Ponce, Jacob Roberts, and others filed a lawsuit against Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. and associated defendants. The case involves procedural activities such as setting or resetting deadlines and hearings, as indicated by docket entry 27. Specific substantive

Central District of California

In the case of Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Mansion Live, LLC et al, the plaintiff, Scottsdale Insurance Company, initiated legal action against Mansion Live, LLC and other defendants. The docket entry indicates that an entry of default has been recorded, suggesting that one or more defendants failed to respond to

Southern District of New York

The case 1:21-cv-02522 Walgreen Co. v. Peters et al involves a legal dispute where Walgreen Co. is the plaintiff and Peters along with other defendants are the respondents. The docket number indicates it is a federal case filed in 2021. Specific details about the claims, parties' arguments, or court rulings are not

Northern District of Illinois

The court granted an extension of time in Morris v. Cheddar's Casual Cafe, Inc. et al, adjusting deadlines for filings or other procedural steps. This order affects the litigation schedule without changing substantive matters.

Northern District of Illinois

The court issued a memorandum opinion and order in Gevas v. Manzano et al, addressing key legal arguments or dispositive motions. This judicial decision clarifies contested issues and shapes the case’s trajectory.

Northern District of Illinois

In re Ethiopian Airlines Flight ET 302 Crash litigation involves complex, multi-party claims arising from the airline disaster. The court granted leave to file documents, reflecting ongoing procedural activity in this high-profile case.