Browse Cases

Southern District of Florida

In the case 1:26-cv-21983 Viltres v. Krome Detention Center, the plaintiff, Viltres, has brought a legal action against the Krome Detention Center. Although specific details of the claims are not provided, the case involves a dispute related to the detention center's operations or treatment of detainees. The docket

Southern District of Florida

In the case of Friedman v. State of Florida, 11th Judicial Circuit et al, the plaintiff, Friedman, has filed a lawsuit against the State of Florida and the 11th Judicial Circuit. The docket number for this case is 25-cv-23043. The case involves a procedural motion for leave to file a document, as indicated by the

Southern District of Florida

In the case 1:26-cv-21576 URDANIVIA v. UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI, the plaintiff, Urdanivia, has brought a legal action against the University of Miami. The case involves a motion filed by one party, to which the opposing party has submitted a formal response in opposition. The specific details of the dispute and the

Southern District of Florida

In the case 1:26-cv-22327 Sawyer v. Assistant Field Office Director et al, the plaintiff, Sawyer, filed a lawsuit against the Assistant Field Office Director and other defendants. The case involves a procedural response to an Order to Show Cause issued by the court, which typically requires a party to justify why a

Southern District of New York

In the case 1:24-cv-03631 BKNS Management LLC v. Frysta Management LLC, the parties are engaged in pretrial proceedings as indicated by the filing of a pretrial statement. The dispute involves two management companies, BKNS Management LLC and Frysta Management LLC, though specific details about the nature of their

Central District of California

In the case 2:24-cv-07779 Seedevice Inc. et al v. Korean Broadcasting System et al, the plaintiffs, Seedevice Inc. and others, have brought a legal action against the Korean Broadcasting System and additional defendants. The case involves a memorandum in opposition to a motion filed by one of the parties, indicating

Central District of California

In the case of Castillo v. A Place For Mom, Inc., docket number 24-cv-02672, the plaintiff brought a lawsuit against the defendant, A Place For Mom, Inc. While specific details of the claims are not provided, the case reached a stage where a jury verdict was proposed, indicating that the matter involved factual

Southern District of New York

The case titled Hoid v. KNOP-2 News et al, docket number 25-cv-08851, appears to involve a notice filed in the matter, though specific details about the claims or parties' arguments are not provided in the available information. The case is pending in an unspecified court, and the docket entry referenced is a

Southern District of New York

The case 1:25-cv-09608 Reyna v. Combs involves a legal dispute between the plaintiff, Reyna, and the defendant, Combs. Specific details about the nature of the claims or the underlying facts are not provided in the available docket entry, which references a notice document filed in the case. Without additional

Southern District of New York

The case 7:25-cv-10694 Plaza Home Mortgage, Inc. v. Bishop, Jr. et al involves a dispute between Plaza Home Mortgage, Inc. and the defendants identified as Bishop, Jr. and others. The filing referenced is a declaration submitted in support of the plaintiff's position, though it is not associated with a specific

Southern District of New York

The case titled Joseph Anthony Reyna v. Graham, docket number 25-cv-06777, is currently pending in an unspecified court. The available docket entry references a notice filed under the category 'Other,' but no further substantive details about the claims, parties, or procedural posture are provided. Due to the limited

Central District of California

The case titled Kimberly Hudson-Bryant v. OCMBC Inc., docket number 24-cv-00067, involves a dispute between the plaintiff, Kimberly Hudson-Bryant, and the defendant, OCMBC Inc. The available information references a sealed declaration filed in support of the case, indicating that certain details are confidential and

Southern District of Florida

In the case of Lopez Ortiz v. Ripa et al, docket number 26-cv-21695, the court issued an order dismissing or closing the case or a party involved. Specific details regarding the underlying claims or procedural history are not provided, but the dismissal indicates that the court resolved the matter by terminating the

Central District of California

Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint in Skyworks Solutions v. Kangxi Communication in the Central District of California. The motion challenges the legal sufficiency of the plaintiff's claims. The case is at a critical procedural juncture that could end litigation if granted.

District of New Jersey

A pretrial conference is scheduled in Muehleisen v. Applied Medical Resources and others in the District of New Jersey. The case is in an early phase focused on case management and scheduling. No substantive rulings or trial activities have occurred yet.

District of New Jersey

Defendants filed an answer to an amended complaint in Estate of William Beczo v. Port Lumber Corp. in the District of New Jersey. The case likely involves wrongful death or related civil claims given the estate's involvement. The filing advances the litigation to the response phase.

District of New Jersey

The District of New Jersey issued an unspecified text order in Nelligan v. Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. The case involves multiple parties and likely concerns employment or healthcare services. The order's content and impact on the case remain unclear.

District of New Jersey

In Vazquez v. Warren, the District of New Jersey recorded a notice to withdraw from the Notice of Electronic Filing. This suggests a change in counsel or party status. No information about the underlying claims or case substance is publicly available.

District of New Jersey

Scura et al filed a civil lawsuit against Revise Clothing, Inc. and others in the District of New Jersey. The docket shows procedural activity but no public details about the claims or nature of the dispute. The case involves multiple defendants but lacks substantive updates.

Central District of California

Ameritas Life Insurance Corp. completed the disbursement of disputed funds in an interpleader action in the Central District of California. The court resolved competing claims to the same funds without addressing liability. This step typically concludes the financial dispute aspect of the case.