Browse Cases

District of Columbia

Civil case in D.D.C. currently marked active.

Northern District of Illinois

Civil case in N.D. Ill. currently marked active.

District of Columbia

Civil case in D.D.C. currently marked active.

District of Columbia

Civil case in D.D.C. currently marked active.

Northern District of Illinois

Civil case in N.D. Ill. currently marked active.

District of Columbia

Civil case in D.D.C. currently marked active.

District of New Jersey

The case of USA v. SALAHALDEEN is currently in an unknown court with docket number 20-cr-00839. The current summary is that a set/reset hearing was scheduled. The case is still ongoing, and no further information is available at this time.

Northern District of Illinois

Soto v. Mahmudov et al is a civil case with a docket number of 26-cv-02764. The current status of the case is Certificate of Service Other. The court has not provided further information about the case. The parties involved in the case are Soto and Mahmudov et al. The case is currently in the initial stages of

District of Columbia

Ragsdale, et al v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company is a civil case. The case was filed in the unknown court with docket number 25-cv-00883. The current status is an extension of time to file on an unknown date.

Northern District of Illinois

The Anthony Dantae Holmes v. United States of America is a criminal case with a current docket number of 24-cv-02054. A Status Report was filed in the case, but the court has not been specified. The case involves a defendant and the government in a potential dispute over a conviction or sentence.

Northern District of California

The Northern District of California issued an order on a motion for early termination of probation in the criminal case USA v. Contreras. The order addresses whether the defendant's probation period should end ahead of schedule.

Central District of California

C.M.04 filed a civil lawsuit against Uber Technologies, Inc. and others in the Central District of California. The case includes corporate disclosure statements to identify interested entities involved in the litigation.

Southern District of New York

The United States scheduled a bond hearing in its criminal case against Fertides in the Southern District of New York. The hearing will determine pretrial release conditions for the defendant.

Eastern District of Texas

Firsov and co-plaintiffs filed suit against Turkish Airlines Inc. in the Eastern District of Texas. The defendants have been formally served, indicating the case is in its early procedural stage.

Northern District of California

In Vaca v. New York Health & Hospitals Corporation et al, the Northern District of California court considered a motion to certify a class. The decision will determine if the case proceeds as a class action or individual lawsuits.

Northern District of California

American Council of Learned Societies and others responded to a Rule 56.1 motion in their civil case against McDonald and others in the Northern District of California. The parties dispute facts relevant to summary judgment.

Northern District of California

Mitto and co-plaintiffs submitted a proposed case management plan in their suit against Mount Sinai Health System, Inc. in the Northern District of California. The plan sets timelines and responsibilities to guide case progression.

Central District of California

Johnson filed a civil lawsuit against TomoCredit, Inc. in the Central District of California. The case includes a scheduled Zoom hearing, indicating ongoing procedural or pretrial activity in the litigation.

Eastern District of Texas

Organicgirl, LLC is involved in a civil dispute in the Eastern District of Texas. The parties submitted a Case Management Statement outlining procedural history and plans, but the underlying claims and defenses remain undisclosed.

Southern District of New York

Steve Manchini sued OSI Systems, Inc. and other defendants in the Southern District of New York. The court confirmed proper service of the summons and complaint within the required 21-day period, advancing the case into the litigation phase.