1:22-cv-00453 LEOPOLD et al v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Status Report ( 43
Civil case in D.D.C. currently marked active. Latest development: 1:22-cv-00453 LEOPOLD et al v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY. Coverage tracked from 1 media source.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
D.D.C.
District of Columbia · D.C. Circuit · DC
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:22-cv-00453 LEOPOLD et al v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Other · Apr 30, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to District of Columbia, a federal district court in DC.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 30, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
LEOPOLD et al v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY is an active civil matter in District of Columbia under docket 22-cv-00453.
The main identified defendant or respondent is CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY. Juryvine classifies the matter around civil litigation, administrative law, federal courts.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The parties filed a joint status report.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
District of Columbia (D.D.C.) is a federal district court in the D.C. Circuit, DC.
The parties filed a joint status report.
Status Report ( 43
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 day, 7 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.