Browse Cases

Northern District of Illinois

Civil case in N.D. Ill. currently marked active.

Central District of California

Civil case in C.D. Cal. currently marked active.

Northern District of Illinois

Civil case in N.D. Ill. currently marked active.

Southern District of New York

Civil case in S.D.N.Y. currently marked active.

Southern District of New York

USA v. Bell et al is a criminal case with a current summary of Request To Modify Conditions/Term of Supervision ( 105. The case was assigned to an unknown court and has a docket number of 16-cr-00459. The court's decision on this case has not been made public yet.

Central District of California

The case of Leatherman v. Social Security Administration is a civil case with an unknown court and docket number 26-cv-80132. The current summary is an Order of Dismissal. This indicates that the court has dismissed the case. The reason for the dismissal is not specified. The case is currently closed.

Northern District of Illinois

The case of Woodbine v. Future Motion, Inc. was transferred to a different district court. The docket number is 26-cv-03495. The transfer was made on the 10th day of the case. The transfer of a case can be a significant development, as it may indicate that the court is seeking to resolve the case more efficiently or

District of Colorado

Fernandez Martinez v. Escalette, LLC is a civil case with docket number 26-cv-00676. The case has been voluntarily dismissed, but the exact reason for the dismissal is not specified in the available information. The case was dismissed without prejudice, which means that the plaintiff can refile the case if they choose

Northern District of California

Precious Holloway v. Aer Lingus Limited, et al. is a civil case. The case is currently in an unknown stage of proceedings. Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge has been filed, but the details of the case are not publicly available.

Northern District of California

Carol Price filed suit against Divurgent, LLC and additional defendants under docket 26-cv-01355. A notice was filed at docket entry 11, placing this case in its earliest stages. Divurgent is a healthcare IT consulting firm, which may inform the nature of the employment or contract dispute. With only 11 docket

Southern District of New York

Manovill et al. are suing HNE Inc. and co-defendants under docket 26-cv-02030. The multi-plaintiff structure and corporate defendant suggest a potential employment dispute, personal injury mass action, or commercial litigation matter. No court has been confirmed. The docket prefix '26-cv' is atypical and may reflect a

District of Massachusetts

Doe et al v. Veradigm, Inc. in the District of Massachusetts includes a motion for pro hac vice admission. This procedural motion allows an out-of-state attorney to appear in the case, indicating preparation for specialized legal representation.

Southern District of New York

LEE, JR., MD v. EMBLEMHEALTH (GHI) is a civil action in the Southern District of New York involving a dispute likely related to health insurance or medical services. The docket does not provide detailed claims or procedural posture.

District of New Jersey

Melendez filed a civil case against Smurfit Kappa North America LLC in the District of New Jersey. The docket notes a notice regarding consent to proceed before a magistrate judge, a procedural step without substantive rulings yet.

District of New Jersey

McMurren et al v. Honeylove Sculptwear, Inc. is a civil case in the District of New Jersey. Recent filings include corporate disclosure statements, standard in corporate litigation to reveal potential conflicts of interest.

Southern District of New York

First Bank of Central Ohio sued Kelsey Asplin ND, LLC in the Southern District of New York. The court issued a scheduling order to organize deadlines, indicating the case is in early stages without detailed claims disclosed.

Southern District of New York

GAYED v. DELANEY HALL DETENTION FACILITY is a habeas petition filed in the Southern District of New York. The petitioner challenges detention conditions or legality, but the docket does not specify grounds or court responses yet.

Southern District of New York

Acquaviva v. Village of Glenview et al is a civil lawsuit in the Southern District of New York involving municipal defendants. The docket lacks details on claims, but the involvement of a village suggests possible municipal liability or civil rights issues.

Southern District of New York

The Southern District of New York court set deadlines for motions and reports in Cunningham v. Sunrise Credit Services. This active case management signals preparation for substantive legal arguments, though specific allegations remain undisclosed.

District of New Jersey

Handy v. WS Barricade Corporation et al involves ongoing litigation in the District of New Jersey. A status report was filed to update the court on case progress and pending matters, reflecting routine docket management.