Browse Cases

District of Columbia

The case of USA v. GALLINA, docketed as 24-cr-00529 in the District of Columbia, has been referred for a Presentence Investigation (PSI) Report. This indicates that the defendant has likely been found guilty or entered a plea of guilty. The PSI report is key for sentencing.

District of Columbia

Mail was returned in the case of ELMORE et al v. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES. This filing in the District of Columbia, docketed as 25-cv-02243, indicates an issue with delivering correspondence to a party. The case is a civil matter.

Northern District of California

An order on an application for an extension of time for delayed notification was issued in the matter concerning the tracking of one target vehicle. This case in the Northern District of California, docketed as 25-mj-70589, relates to violations of 21 U.S.C. Sections 841 and 846. The order pertains to the timing of

District of Colorado

An order on a motion for summary judgment was issued in White v. Baldridge et al. This civil case in the District of Colorado, docketed as 21-cv-02937, involves a request for a ruling that there are no genuine disputes of material fact. The order likely addresses whether the case can proceed to trial.

District of Colorado

The case of USA v. Gamboa-Gamboa is proceeding in the District of Colorado under docket number 22-cr-00328. No specific filing details were provided in the current summary. This is a criminal matter.

Northern District of Illinois

The docket for Moriarty v. Goffe shows no recent activity or specific filings described. The case is a civil matter in the Northern District of Illinois. Further information is needed to assess the current status and key issues of this litigation.

Central District of California

A plea agreement was filed in the case of USA v. Guachiac. The document is 17 pages long. This filing suggests a resolution or partial resolution of the criminal charges. This federal criminal case is before the Central District of California.

District of Massachusetts

A petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 was filed in the case of USA v. Scott et al. This filing in the District of Massachusetts suggests a challenge to the legality of a person's detention or confinement. The case is docketed as 26-mj-02763.

Northern District of California

The United States applied for an order for a pre-trial restraint and forfeiture (PRTT) for one account. This action is related to an investigation into alleged violations of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and other offenses. An order on a motion to seal has been issued in this matter.

District of Columbia

A notice of change of address was filed in the case of DOYLE et al v. LOVE UNITED TRANSPORT, INC. et al. This filing in the District of Columbia indicates a change in contact information for one of the parties. The case is docketed as 25-cv-04371.

Southern District of Florida

The court issued an order in the case of Sweet Additions Ingredient Processors, LLC v. Meelunie America, Inc. This order signifies a judicial decision or directive related to the ongoing litigation. The specific content of the order was not detailed in the provided summary.

Southern District of Florida

No specific filing information was provided for the case South River Warehouse, LLC v. CITY OF MIAMI. The case is active in the Southern District of Florida. Further details are needed to assess the current status or key developments.

Eastern District of Texas

A notice to the receiving district of criminal case transfer was filed by the United States concerning Pacheco-Ortuna et al. This document indicates the case is being moved between federal judicial districts. It is a standard administrative procedure for ongoing criminal matters.

Eastern District of Texas

The United States filed a notice to the receiving district regarding the criminal case transfer of Tompkins et al. This filing signals that the case is moving from one federal jurisdiction to another. It is a procedural step to ensure continuity of the prosecution.

Eastern District of Texas

The United States filed a sealed objection to the Presentence Investigation Report in the criminal case against Trotter and others. This objection challenges findings within the report, which is used to determine sentencing. The sealed nature indicates sensitive information is involved.

District of New Jersey

No specific filing information was provided for the case VITALE v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al. The case is active in the District of New Jersey. Additional details are required to understand the current stage of proceedings.

District of New Jersey

No specific filing information was provided for the case LUDWIG v. CALLIGARO, DPM et al. The case is currently active in the District of New Jersey. Further details are needed to assess the current status or key developments.

District of New Jersey

The court issued an order for 60-day administrative termination in the case of AMMANA v. AGELIX CONSULTING. This order typically means the case is being paused or administratively closed for a set period, often due to inactivity or pending external events. The parties will likely need to show cause to reopen or

District of Massachusetts

August Image, LLC requested and was granted an extension of time in its case against TechTarget, Inc. This filing indicates a delay in a scheduled deadline. The specific deadline and the reason for the extension were not detailed.

Northern District of California

Antoine and defendants Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and others submitted a stipulation and proposed order. A stipulation is an agreement between the parties on a particular matter. The proposed order suggests the parties are seeking the court's approval of their agreed-upon terms.