Browse Cases

District of Columbia

A request for leave to file a review was submitted in the case of USA v. DOUGLAS. This filing in the District of Columbia, docketed as 13-cr-00011, suggests a party is seeking permission to submit a document for judicial review. The case is a criminal matter.

District of New Jersey

The United States filed a notice regarding sentencing materials in the criminal case against CLARK. This filing, docketed as 21-cr-00834 in the District of New Jersey, signals that the case is nearing or at the sentencing phase. The notice likely pertains to evidence or arguments to be presented at sentencing.

District of New Jersey

Edwards filed an answering brief in opposition to a motion in this case against the Delaware Department of Correction. The filing is 27 pages long. This indicates a substantive legal argument is being presented in response to a prior motion.

Northern District of California

Rodriguez filed a lawsuit against Burnett and others in the Northern District of California. The docket indicates the case is active, but no specific filings are detailed in the provided summary. Further review of the docket is needed to understand the current status. This civil action is proceeding under docket

District of New Jersey

Michael Silva v. Apex Class Action LLC et al is a civil case filed in the District of New Jersey. The case was dismissed on an unspecified date.

District of New Jersey

Jelber Ediveth Diaz Osorio has filed an answer to a complaint in this civil action. The case, docketed as 26-cv-00757, is proceeding in the District of New Jersey. The answer is a formal response to the allegations made in the initial complaint.

District of New Jersey

Dustin Harton Chase filed a notice of appearance in his case against the Warden. The filing indicates legal representation has been formally entered. No further details on the substance of the case are available from this filing.

Northern District of California

Kennard Development Group sued Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. and others. The court issued a summons, officially notifying the defendants of the legal action. This marks the formal commencement of the lawsuit against the named parties. The summons requires the defendants to respond to the complaint filed by

Northern District of California

In re Apple iPhone Antitrust Litigation is a civil case in the Northern District of California. The case was filed on an unspecified date and has a docket number of 11-cv-06714. The current summary of the case is that a notice of appearance/substitution/change/withdrawal of attorney has been filed.

District of Massachusetts

Boyar v. United States of America is a civil case in the District of Massachusetts. The case was filed on an unspecified date and has a docket number of 25-cv-40204. The current summary of the case is that an answer to complaint has been filed.

District of Massachusetts

USA v. Ruel is a criminal case in the District of Massachusetts. The case was filed on an unspecified date and has a docket number of 26-cr-10139. The current summary of the case is that a notice of case assignment has been issued.

District of Massachusetts

Karfunkel v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc. et al is a civil case in the District of Massachusetts. The case was filed on an unspecified date and has a docket number of 25-cv-13532. The current summary of the case is that no information is available.

District of Delaware

USA v. Brown, et al is a criminal case in the District of Delaware. The case was filed on an unspecified date and has a docket number of 22-cr-00070. The current summary of the case is that no information is available.

District of Columbia

MASSEY et al v. TRUMP et al is a civil case in the District of Columbia. The case was filed on an unspecified date and has a docket number of 25-cv-03494. The current summary of the case is that an order on leave to file review has been issued.

District of Columbia

Vales et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. is a civil case in the District of Columbia. The case was filed on an unspecified date and has a docket number of 25-cv-10043. The current summary of the case is that a hearing termination has been set.

Southern District of New York

SpecialtyCare, Inc. v. California Physicians' Services, Inc. is a civil case in the Southern District of New York. The case was filed on an unspecified date and has a docket number of 24-cv-09339. The current summary of the case is that an amended complaint has been filed.

District of Columbia

CRAYTON v. FEAZELL is a civil case in the District of Columbia. The court has issued an order granting leave to file a review. This suggests a party has received permission to submit a document for judicial examination.

Southern District of New York

USA v. ROSALES BANEGAS is a criminal case in the Southern District of New York. The court has issued an order on a letter motion. The specifics of the motion and the court's decision are not detailed in this entry.

District of Columbia

KNIGHT v. MALONEY & MOHSEN PLLC is a civil case in the District of Columbia. The court has issued an order regarding a motion for a certificate of appealability. This indicates a party is seeking permission to appeal a prior decision.

Southern District of New York

QBE Insurance Corporation v. EBF Holdings, LLC d/b/a Everest Business Funding is a miscellaneous case in the Southern District of New York. The filing is an acknowledgment of service. This confirms that a party has officially received notice of a legal document.