legal-news

Cargill, Incorporated v. Public Joint Stock Company National Bank Trust

23-mc-00134
Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Cargill, Incorporated filed a miscellaneous action against Public Joint Stock Company National Bank Trust under docket 23-mc-00134. The court issued an order on a motion to quash at docket entry 74, indicating a discovery or subpoena dispute is at the center of this proceeding. Miscellaneous dockets of this type typically arise from efforts to enforce subpoenas or obtain discovery in aid of foreign or domestic litigation. The motion to quash order is a significant procedural milestone that likely determines what evidence Cargill can obtain from the Russian state-affiliated bank.

Latest development

1:23-mc-00134 Cargill, Incorporated v. Public Joint Stock Company National Bank Trust

Order · April 20, 2026

A Motion was filed.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • Subpoena enforcement against a foreign state-affiliated bank
  • Motion to quash ruling and its scope
  • Cross-border discovery in aid of underlying litigation
  • Jurisdictional questions over a foreign entity
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 3 hours, 1 minute ago

A federal miscellaneous proceeding pits Cargill, Incorporated against Public Joint Stock Company National Bank Trust (NBT), a Russian state-linked bank, in a dispute that appears to center on third-party discovery — the kind of satellite litigation that follows a main action elsewhere and lives or dies on a motion to quash.

The docket, numbered 23-mc-00134, was opened as a miscellaneous case, which typically signals a subpoena enforcement fight or a request to take discovery for use in a foreign or domestic proceeding. No judge has been publicly assigned, and the original filing date is not confirmed in available records. The case has remained active into 2026.

The most recent docket entry, dated April 20, 2026, reflects an order on a motion to quash — docket entry 74. That entry number suggests the case has generated substantial motion practice for a miscellaneous proceeding. A ruling on a motion to quash at this stage either forces compliance with a subpoena or cuts off the discovery request entirely.

The substance of that ruling is not yet reflected in available case details.

The identity of the parties matters. Cargill is one of the largest privately held companies in the United States, with deep exposure to global commodity markets. NBT is a Russian bank operating under sanctions pressure following Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

Discovery disputes involving sanctioned Russian entities in U.S. courts carry added friction — counsel must handle Office of Foreign Assets Control licensing requirements, and courts have occasionally stayed or limited proceedings touching sanctioned parties.

Without a confirmed originating court or the underlying action this miscellaneous case supports, the precise stakes are hard to pin down. The volume of filings through entry 74 suggests neither side has backed down. Cargill presumably wants documents or testimony NBT does not want to produce.

The April 2026 order on the motion to quash is the pivot point — it will determine whether discovery proceeds, stalls, or ends here.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
gavel
Order 5 hours ago
A Motion was filed.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Order on Motion to Quash ( 74

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
gavel
Order April 20, 2026

1:23-mc-00134 Cargill, Incorporated v. Public Joint Stock Company National Bank Trust

A Motion was filed.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

2 hours, 6 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.