legal-news

Israel v. Tomlison et al

24-cv-03718
Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

This civil matter, docketed as 24-cv-03718 in Israel v. Tomlinson et al., is at a procedural stage involving a motion for extension of time to file. The docket entry references document number 77, suggesting the case has accumulated substantial filings and has been active for some time. Beyond the extension request, the underlying facts, claims, and parties' positions are not available from the current record. The motion signals at least one party needs additional time to meet a filing deadline, which may affect the case schedule.

Latest development

3:24-cv-03718 Israel v. Tomlison et al

Order · April 20, 2026

A Motion was filed.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • Motion for extension of time to file
  • Case scheduling and deadline compliance
  • Underlying claims between Israel and Tomlinson et al. — nature undisclosed
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 4 hours, 3 minutes ago

A federal civil case styled Israel v. Tomlison et al., docket 24-cv-03718, is active but thin on public detail. The court of record has not been confirmed, no judge has been assigned, and the original filing date is not yet established in the available record.

What is known: the case has been moving, at least procedurally.

The most recent docket entry, dated April 20, 2026, reflects an order on a motion for extension of time to file — docket entry 77. That entry number suggests the case has generated substantial motion practice since it was opened. An extension order at entry 77 is not a substantive ruling on the merits; it means one side asked for more time to file something, and the court ruled on that request.

The key issues driving the dispute have not been disclosed in the available case data. The parties are identified only as Israel (plaintiff) and Tomlison et al. (defendants), with no further detail on the nature of the claims, the relief sought, or the dollar amounts at stake.

The 'et al.' designation means at least one additional defendant beyond Tomlison is named in the complaint.

Without a confirmed court, assigned judge, or identified claims, this case cannot be read on the merits yet. The procedural posture — active, with a recent extension order — suggests the parties are still in pre-trial motion practice or discovery. The volume of docket entries implies the case is not dormant.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
gavel
Order 4 hours ago
A Motion was filed.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File ( 77

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
gavel
Order April 20, 2026

3:24-cv-03718 Israel v. Tomlison et al

A Motion was filed.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

3 hours, 4 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.