District of Columbia court receives motion for letters rogatory in BH Innovations LLC v. HKC Corporation Ltd.
Case Summary
The District of Columbia court received a motion for letters rogatory in BH Innovations LLC v. HKC Corporation Ltd. This motion initiates a request for judicial assistance from a foreign court, typically to obtain evidence or testimony abroad.
Latest development
1:26-mc-00071 BH INNOVATIONS LLC et al v. HKC CORPORATION LTD. et al
Motion · May 12, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingKey Issues
- • Letters rogatory
- • International judicial assistance
- • Evidence gathering
Docket Snapshot
Court
D.D.C.
District of Columbia · D.C. Circuit · DC
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Motion practice
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:26-mc-00071 BH INNOVATIONS LLC et al v. HKC CORPORATION LTD. et al
Motion · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff, 1 Related Organization
3 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of Columbia, a federal district court in DC.
The newest docket activity we have is a motion dated May 12, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes HKC CORPORATION LTD, BH INNOVATIONS LLC and others.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Motion for Letters Rogatory (Initiating) ( 1
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
About This Court
District of Columbia (D.D.C.) is a federal district court in the D.C. Circuit, DC.
Case Timeline
1 event1:26-mc-00071 BH INNOVATIONS LLC et al v. HKC CORPORATION LTD. et al
A Motion was filed.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
16 hours, 54 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.