civil-litigation federal-courts court-watch

Roach v. Target Corporation

26-cv-20849 S.D. Fla.
Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Civil case in S.D. Fla. currently marked active. Latest development: 1:25-cv-26086 Rodriguez Aquino v. Target Corporation.

Latest development

1:25-cv-26086 Rodriguez Aquino v. Target Corporation

Order · May 12, 2026

The court issued an order.

description View filing
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

S.D. Fla.

Southern District of Florida · 11th Circuit · FL

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Court order issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:25-cv-26086 Rodriguez Aquino v. Target Corporation

Order · May 12, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff

3 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Southern District of Florida, a federal district court in FL.

The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 12, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Target Corporation, 1:25-cv-26086 Rodriguez Aquino and others.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 0 minutes ago

Roach v. Target Corporation is an active federal case in the Southern District of Florida, docket number 26-cv-20849. The case involves plaintiff Roach suing Target Corporation, but the specific claims remain unclear from the public docket.

The court has not yet assigned a district judge. On May 12, 2026, the court issued an order referring the case to a magistrate judge. This step typically signals the court's intent to manage pretrial matters or explore settlement options early in the litigation process.

On the same day, a motion was filed, though the docket does not specify its nature or which party filed it. The case remains in its early stages, with no dispositive motions or trial dates set. The referral to a magistrate judge suggests the court is preparing to handle discovery disputes or other procedural issues.

Parties will likely engage in initial disclosures and scheduling conferences once a judge is assigned. The absence of a judge assignment means the case is still settling into the court’s docket. The plaintiff’s claims and Target’s defenses will become clearer as the case progresses through pretrial motions and discovery.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

2 events
gavel
Order 2 hours ago
The court issued an order.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge ( 8

Open original open_in_new
edit_note
Motion 7 hours ago
A Motion was filed.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Motion to Seal (Public) ( 9

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

About This Court

Southern District of Florida (S.D. Fla.) is a federal district court in the 11th Circuit, FL.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
gavel
Order May 12, 2026

1:25-cv-26086 Rodriguez Aquino v. Target Corporation

The court issued an order.

edit_note
Motion May 12, 2026

1:26-cv-20849 Roach v. Target Corporation

A Motion was filed.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

59 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.