legal-news

Williams, Kareem v. Deputy Haas et al

25-cv-80832
Active Initial filing stage Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Williams, Kareem v. Deputy Haas et al involves a filing where the court clerk has received payment combining a full and partial filing fee. This indicates the plaintiff is complying with court fee requirements, possibly in phases, to maintain the case's active status. The case appears to be in the early procedural phase, with administrative matters being addressed. The underlying claims or issues have not been detailed in the docket information provided.

Latest development

9:25-cv-80832 Williams, Kareem v. Deputy Haas et al

Filing · April 15, 2026

In the case of Williams v. Deputy Haas and others, the court clerk received a payment that includes both the full filing fee and a partial filing fee. This payment is necessary for the case to proceed through the court system. It shows that the plaintiff is complying with court requirements to move the lawsuit forward.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • Filing fee payment
  • Case initiation
  • Procedural compliance
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
description
Filing April 15, 2026

9:25-cv-80832 Williams, Kareem v. Deputy Haas et al

In the case of Williams v. Deputy Haas and others, the court clerk received a payment that includes both the full filing fee and a partial filing fee. This payment is necessary for the case to proceed through the court system. It shows that the plaintiff is complying with court requirements to move the lawsuit forward.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

3 days, 17 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.