legal-news

Michael J. Butala v. Owlet, Inc. et al

21-cv-09016
Active Initial filing stage Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

This case involves Michael J. Butala filing a lawsuit against Owlet, Inc. and other defendants. The docket number is 21-cv-09016, but the court is unspecified. Recently, a notice of filing transcript was submitted, indicating ongoing procedural developments in the litigation.

Latest development

2:21-cv-09016 Michael J. Butala v. Owlet, Inc. et al

Filing · April 15, 2026

In the case of Michael J. Butala versus Owlet, Inc. and others, a transcript of a court proceeding was officially submitted to the court. This means the detailed record of what was said during a hearing or deposition is now part of the case file. Having this transcript is important for ensuring an accurate account of the events and statements made during the legal process.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • Product liability
  • Consumer protection
  • Contract disputes
  • Procedural filings
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
description
Filing April 15, 2026

2:21-cv-09016 Michael J. Butala v. Owlet, Inc. et al

In the case of Michael J. Butala versus Owlet, Inc. and others, a transcript of a court proceeding was officially submitted to the court. This means the detailed record of what was said during a hearing or deposition is now part of the case file. Having this transcript is important for ensuring an accurate account of the events and statements made during the legal process.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

3 days, 17 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.