Wolfe has sued The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, L.L.C., with docket activity including a teleconference via Zoom. This suggests ongoing procedural coordination, possibly related to discovery or case scheduling, but no substantive rulings or claims details are provided.
Latest development
Order · April 15, 2026
The court issued an initial order to schedule a Rule 26 conference for the case Tragan Campbell v. The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, LLC. This conference is an early step where the parties discuss the case timeline and discovery plans. It matters because it sets the framework for how the case will proceed and ensures both sides are prepared.
description View filingInitial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only ( 10
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
The court issued an initial order to schedule a Rule 26 conference for the case Tragan Campbell v. The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, LLC. This conference is an early step where the parties discuss the case timeline and discovery plans. It matters because it sets the framework for how the case will proceed and ensures both sides are prepared.
A teleconference via Zoom was held in the case Wolfe v. The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, L.L.C. This virtual meeting allowed the parties and the court to discuss case matters without needing to meet in person. Such teleconferences help keep the case moving forward efficiently.
Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only ( 10
~Util - Teleconference Zoom ( 30
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
3 days, 20 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.