legal-news

1:26-mc-00088 Salzman et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran et al

updateUpdated 1 day ago
26-mc-00088 Filed
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

This case, Salzman et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran et al, involves plaintiffs pursuing claims against the Islamic Republic of Iran and related entities. The docket indicates ongoing procedural activity, including a proposed order, but specific substantive details are not provided in the available summary.

Stage

Active litigation

Timeline

9 events

Coverage

9 articles

Sources

1

Key Issues

  • Sovereign immunity
  • State-sponsored actions
  • Jurisdictional challenges

update What Changed This Week

9 events 9 articles
Advertisement

Case Timeline

9 events
info
Other April 15, 2026

1:13-cv-09195 Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran et al

In the case Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran, a status report was filed to update the court on the progress or current state of the proceedings. This report helps the court and parties stay informed about developments or any outstanding issues in the case. Such updates are routine but essential for managing the case efficiently.

description
Filing April 15, 2026

1:25-cv-00931 LOWELL et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN

In the case of Lowell et al. versus the Islamic Republic of Iran, a redacted document was officially submitted to the court. This means sensitive information was removed before filing to protect confidentiality. Such filings help maintain transparency while safeguarding important details.

info
Other April 15, 2026

1:21-cv-01808 MARTINO et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN

In the case of Martino et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran, a document was filed under seal, meaning its contents are kept confidential and not publicly disclosed. This step often occurs when sensitive information is involved, protecting privacy or security interests. The filing indicates ongoing legal proceedings and the handling of important evidence or arguments behind closed doors.

gavel
Order April 15, 2026

1:23-cv-07283 Kelly et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran

In the case Kelly et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran, the court issued a proposed order related to the ongoing litigation. This step is part of the court's process to manage the case and potentially resolve specific issues before trial. It matters because such orders can influence the direction and outcome of the lawsuit.

gavel
Order April 15, 2026

1:18-cv-11870 Kim et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran

The court issued a proposed order related to the case Kim et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran, which is connected to the broader matter Salzman et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran. This step is part of the ongoing legal process to address claims against Iran in these related lawsuits.

gavel
Order April 15, 2026

1:24-cv-05520 Jelnek et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran

In the case Jelnek et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran, the court issued a proposed order related to the ongoing litigation. This step is part of the procedural process to address specific issues or motions in the case. It matters because such orders can influence how the case proceeds and impact the parties involved.

info
Other April 15, 2026

1:26-mc-00090 Weinstein et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran et al

The court reassigned the case Weinstein et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran et al to a different judge or court division. This procedural update ensures the case is properly managed and moves forward in the judicial process. Such reassignments can affect the timeline and handling of the case.

info
Other April 15, 2026

1:26-mc-00089 Stern et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran et al

The court issued a notice that the case titled Stern et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran et al has been assigned or reassigned to a judge. This means the case now has a specific judge responsible for overseeing its progress, which is a routine but essential step in managing the court's docket. Assigning a judge ensures that the case will move forward in an organized manner.

info
Other April 15, 2026

1:26-mc-00088 Salzman et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran et al

The court has officially assigned or reassigned the case Salzman et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran et al to a judge or court division. This procedural step ensures that the case has a designated authority to oversee its progress and make rulings. It is a routine but necessary action to move the case forward.

Advertisement
show_chart

Coverage Timeline

newspaper

Press Coverage

9 articles