1:26-cv-02808 Rivera Guzman v. Arteta et al
Case Summary
Rivera Guzman v. Arteta et al, docket 26-cv-02808, is a civil case with recent activity focused on setting deadlines and hearings. This indicates the case is in early or mid procedural stages.
Stage
Active litigation
Timeline
6 events
Coverage
6 articles
Sources
1
Key Issues
- • Civil litigation
- • Case scheduling
- • Hearing management
Case Timeline
6 events1:26-cv-02229 Figueredo Castillo v. Arteta et al
In the case Rivera Guzman v. Arteta et al, a related event was noted involving another case, Figueredo Castillo v. Arteta et al. This indicates that the court is acknowledging a connection or similarity between these two cases, which may affect how they are handled. Recognizing related cases can streamline proceedings and ensure consistent rulings.
1:26-cv-02945 Castillo Flores v. Arteta et al
In the case of Castillo Flores v. Arteta et al, a Notice of Appearance was filed, indicating that a lawyer has officially entered the case to represent one of the parties. This is a routine but important procedural step that ensures the court and all parties know who is representing whom. It helps maintain clear communication and proper legal process throughout the case.
1:26-cv-02979 Joseph v. Arteta et al
A court hearing was held in the case Joseph v. Arteta et al to establish deadlines and schedule future hearings. This procedural step helps organize the case timeline and ensures that all parties know when to submit documents and appear in court. Setting these deadlines is crucial for the efficient progress of the lawsuit.
1:26-cv-02672 Oldacre v. Aretea et al
In the case Rivera Guzman v. Arteta et al, the court issued an order related to the case Oldacre v. Aretea et al, granting an extension of time for one party to file their response or reply. This means the court allowed more time for the involved party to prepare and submit their legal documents. It matters because it affects the timeline and progress of the case.
1:26-cv-02808 Rivera Guzman v. Arteta et al
The court issued an order regarding a request to extend the deadline for a particular action in the case Rivera Guzman v. Arteta et al. This means one party asked for more time to complete a task, and the court has officially responded to that request. Such extensions can impact the timeline and progress of the case.
1:22-cv-22572 Day v. Datta et al
In the case Rivera Guzman v. Arteta et al, a motion was filed opposing a previous motion numbered 114 in the related case Day v. Datta et al. This opposition indicates that one party disagrees with the request made in motion 114 and is formally presenting their arguments against it. Such motions are critical as they can influence the court's decisions and the direction of the case.
Press Coverage
1:26-cv-02229 Figueredo Castillo v. Arteta et al
1:26-cv-02945 Castillo Flores v. Arteta et al
Notice of Appearance ( 4
1:26-cv-02979 Joseph v. Arteta et al
~Util - Set Deadlines/Hearings ( 5
1:26-cv-02672 Oldacre v. Aretea et al
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ( 14
1:26-cv-02808 Rivera Guzman v. Arteta et al
Order on Motion for Extension of Time ( 18
1:22-cv-22572 Day v. Datta et al
in Opposition to Motion ( 114 )