Torres-Maggio v. West et al
Case Summary
In Torres-Maggio v. West et al., docket 25-cv-61734, a party has filed opposition to a motion, signaling active contested motions within this civil case. The nature of the motion opposed is not specified, but such filings often relate to dispositive motions or procedural requests.
Latest development
0:25-cv-61734 Torres-Maggio v. West et al
Motion · April 13, 2026
In the case Torres-Maggio v. West et al, the opposing party filed a response opposing a previously submitted motion numbered 31. This means they disagreed with the request made in that motion and provided reasons to convince the court not to grant it. Such opposition is a normal part of legal proceedings, allowing both sides to present their arguments before the court decides.
description View filingKey Issues
- • Opposition to motion
- • Procedural disputes
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
in Opposition to Motion ( 31 )
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
2 events3:26-cv-00756 Uzun v. East et al
In the case Uzun v. East et al, the court issued a Report and Recommendations document. This report typically contains the judge's analysis and suggestions on how the case should proceed or be resolved. It matters because it guides the court's next steps and can influence the final outcome of the case.
0:25-cv-61734 Torres-Maggio v. West et al
In the case Torres-Maggio v. West et al, the opposing party filed a response opposing a previously submitted motion numbered 31. This means they disagreed with the request made in that motion and provided reasons to convince the court not to grant it. Such opposition is a normal part of legal proceedings, allowing both sides to present their arguments before the court decides.
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
3 days, 20 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.