newspaper
pacer
4:25-cv-09601 Orozco Acosta v. Bondi et al
Withdraw as Party's Only Attorney ( 24
Apr 15, 2026
legal-news
Bamba v. Bondi et al
26-cv-01681
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
This case, Bamba v. Bondi et al, involves a dispute currently marked by opposition to a pending motion. The details of the underlying claims or defenses are not specified, but the procedural posture indicates active litigation with contested motions.
Stage
Active litigation
Timeline
12 events
Coverage
12 articles
Sources
1
Key Issues
- • Opposition to motion
- • Procedural disputes
- • Litigation strategy
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
update What Changed This Week
4 events
gavel
Order
3 days ago
In the case of Bamba v. Bondi et al, the court issued an order related to the case Santos-Salguero v. Bondi et al, indicating that the parties have agreed to allow a magistrate judge to oversee certain aspects of the case. This means that t
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Order on Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge
Open original open_in_new
gavel
Order
3 days ago
The court issued a text order related to the case Hamid v. Bondi et al, which is connected to the Bamba v. Bondi et al lawsuit. This order likely addresses procedural or administrative matters that affect how the cases proceed. Such orders
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
[Text Order]
Open original open_in_new
gavel
Order
4 days ago
In the case Luo v. Bondi et al, the parties agreed to voluntarily dismiss the lawsuit, as reflected in the court's order. This means the plaintiff decided to drop the case without further legal proceedings. Such dismissals can indicate a se
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Stipulation and Order of Voluntary Dismissal ( 19
Open original open_in_new
edit_note
Motion
5 days ago
In the case DHIAB v. Bondi et al, the opposing party submitted a response opposing a previously filed motion numbered 11. This means they disagreed with the request made in that motion and provided reasons to counter it. Such opposition is
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
in Opposition to Motion ( 11 )
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
12 events
info
Other
April 15, 2026
4:25-cv-09601 Orozco Acosta v. Bondi et al
In the case of Orozco Acosta v. Bondi et al, the attorney representing one of the parties officially withdrew from the case. This means the party will need to find new legal representation or proceed without an attorney. Such a change can affect the pace and strategy of the case.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
3:26-cv-02771 HUARIPATA LLAUCA v. BONDI et al
In the case of Huaripata Llauca v. Bondi et al, a substitute attorney has been appointed to represent one of the parties. This change in legal representation can impact the progress and strategy of the case. It matters because new counsel may bring different approaches or expertise that could influence the outcome.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
2:26-cv-02887 ALFARO PIZARRO v. BONDI et al
In the case Alfaro Pizarro v. Bondi et al, the court received returned mail related to the case. This indicates that important documents sent by the court or parties involved could not be delivered to the intended recipient. Such an event can delay proceedings and may require updated contact information or alternative service methods.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
3:25-cv-09273 Kacar v. Bondi et al
In the case Kacar v. Bondi et al, the plaintiff filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, meaning they have chosen to voluntarily end the lawsuit without pursuing it further. This action effectively closes the case unless the plaintiff decides to refile or appeal. It matters because it stops the legal proceedings and any associated claims from moving forward.
gavel
Order
April 15, 2026
1:26-cv-01465 Santos-Salguero v. Bondi et al
In the case of Bamba v. Bondi et al, the court issued an order related to the case Santos-Salguero v. Bondi et al, indicating that the parties have agreed to allow a magistrate judge to oversee certain aspects of the case. This means that the magistrate judge will have authority to handle pretrial matters or other judicial proceedings, which can help streamline the process.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
1:25-cv-02480 ARMSTRONG v. BONDI et al
In the case of Bamba v. Bondi et al, the court granted an extension of time for the parties to file their response or reply related to the Armstrong v. Bondi et al case. This means the deadline to submit important legal documents has been extended, allowing more time for preparation. Such extensions can impact the timeline of the case and the strategy of the parties involved.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
3:26-cv-03770 MORALES-MENDOZA v. BONDI et al
A new case titled Morales-Mendoza v. Bondi et al was filed and assigned the number 3:26-cv-03770. This event indicates the initiation of legal proceedings involving the same defendant, Bondi, as in the earlier Bamba case. It matters because it shows ongoing or related litigation against Bondi, which could impact the defendant's legal strategy and resource allocation.
gavel
Order
April 15, 2026
2:26-cv-00835 HAMID v. BONDI et al
The court issued a text order related to the case Hamid v. Bondi et al, which is connected to the Bamba v. Bondi et al lawsuit. This order likely addresses procedural or administrative matters that affect how the cases proceed. Such orders help manage the legal process efficiently and ensure both cases are handled properly.
gavel
Order
April 14, 2026
1:26-cv-01930 Luo v. Bondi et al
In the case Luo v. Bondi et al, the parties agreed to voluntarily dismiss the lawsuit, as reflected in the court's order. This means the plaintiff decided to drop the case without further legal proceedings. Such dismissals can indicate a settlement or a decision not to pursue the claims.
info
Other
April 14, 2026
0:26-cv-60713 Rojas Jimenez v. Bondi et al
In the case of Rojas Jimenez v. Bondi et al, the court issued an order to set or reset deadlines related to the proceedings. This means the court adjusted the timeline for certain actions or filings in the case, which helps manage the pace of the litigation. Setting clear deadlines ensures that the case progresses efficiently and that all parties have a fair opportunity to prepare.
info
Other
April 13, 2026
1:26-cv-01681 Bamba v. Bondi et al
In the case Bamba v. Bondi et al, a Certificate of Service for the complaints was filed. This document confirms that the legal complaints have been officially delivered to the involved parties. It is a crucial procedural step to ensure all parties are informed and the case can proceed properly.
edit_note
Motion
April 13, 2026
1:26-cv-20731 DHIAB v. Bondi et al
In the case DHIAB v. Bondi et al, the opposing party submitted a response opposing a previously filed motion numbered 11. This means they disagreed with the request made in that motion and provided reasons to counter it. Such opposition is a normal part of legal proceedings, allowing both sides to present their arguments before the court decides.
Loading more events...
Advertisement
newspaper
12 articles
Press Coverage
newspaper
newspaper
newspaper
newspaper
pacer
1:26-cv-01465 Santos-Salguero v. Bondi et al
Order on Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge
Apr 15, 2026
newspaper
pacer
1:25-cv-02480 ARMSTRONG v. BONDI et al
Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ( 38
Apr 15, 2026
newspaper
newspaper
newspaper
pacer
1:26-cv-01930 Luo v. Bondi et al
Stipulation and Order of Voluntary Dismissal ( 19
Apr 14, 2026
newspaper
newspaper
newspaper
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 12 articles
Timeline events
12 records on file
Last updated
3 days, 20 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.