Perez Mendez v. Equifax Information Services, LLC
Case Summary
Perez Mendez v. Equifax Information Services, LLC is a civil case involving a major credit reporting agency. The docket entry references notices concerning pending, refiled, or related actions, indicating possible coordination or consolidation with similar claims, potentially involving consumer credit disputes or data accuracy issues.
Latest development
0:25-cv-62582 Altman v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
Motion · April 13, 2026
In the case Altman v. Equifax Information Services, LLC and others, the opposing party filed a response to a motion numbered 32. This means they are formally disagreeing with a request made by the other side, which could influence how the court decides on a particular issue in the case.
description View filingKey Issues
- • Credit reporting accuracy
- • Related or consolidated actions
- • Procedural notices
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
in Opposition to Motion ( 32 )
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
12 events9:26-cv-80422 Kelly Jones v. Equifax Information Services LLC
In the case of Kelly Jones v. Equifax Information Services LLC, a summons was issued, officially notifying the defendant about the lawsuit and requiring their response. This step is crucial as it formally starts the legal process and ensures the defendant is aware of the claims against them.
1:26-cv-03975 BROWN v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC et al
A new case titled Brown v. Equifax Information Services LLC and others was filed, adding to ongoing litigation involving Equifax. This event is notable because it indicates continued legal challenges against Equifax, potentially related to consumer information or data issues. Tracking these cases helps understand the broader legal pressures facing Equifax.
1:23-cv-02043 FRAZIER v. Equifax Information Services LLC
In the case Perez Mendez v. Equifax Information Services, the court granted an extension of time for the parties involved in the related case Frazier v. Equifax Information Services to file their response or reply. This means the deadline to submit important legal documents was officially extended, allowing more time for preparation. Such extensions can impact the pace and strategy of the litigation process.
1:25-cv-25312 Perez Mendez v. Equifax Information Services, LLC
In the case Perez Mendez v. Equifax Information Services, LLC, the court granted an extension for the deadline to complete discovery. This means the parties have more time to gather and exchange evidence before the trial. Extending discovery deadlines can impact the timeline of the case and allow for a more thorough preparation.
7:26-cv-01232 Gaynor v. Equifax Information Services LLC et al
In the case Gaynor v. Equifax Information Services LLC, the defendant submitted their official response to the plaintiff's complaint. This step is crucial as it outlines the defendant's position and defenses regarding the allegations made. It marks the beginning of the formal legal dispute process between the parties.
1:25-cv-21595 Moore v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
In the case Perez Mendez v. Equifax Information Services, LLC, a notice related to another case, Moore v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al, was filed. This indicates a connection or relevance between the two cases, possibly affecting proceedings or legal strategies. Such notices help courts and parties stay informed about related litigation.
1:26-cv-22554 Hercovich Montalba v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
In the case of Hercovich Montalba v. Equifax Information Services, LLC and others, the court clerk issued a notice to the filer regarding the electronic case and the summons documents. This means the court is officially acknowledging the filing and ensuring the parties are informed about the summons, which initiates the legal process. It matters because it confirms the case is active and the defendants are formally being notified to respond.
2:26-cv-14122 Selph v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, et al
In the case Perez Mendez v. Equifax Information Services, LLC, the court received a notice indicating that there are other related or similar lawsuits, including Selph v. Equifax Information Services LLC. This notice helps the court stay informed about related cases that might impact or overlap with the current one.
0:25-cv-62309 Rodriguez v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
In the case Perez Mendez v. Equifax Information Services, LLC, an amended complaint and an amended notice of removal were filed, indicating that the plaintiff updated their claims and the defendant formally moved the case from state court to federal court. This procedural step is important as it can affect the jurisdiction and how the case will proceed. The reference to another case, Rodriguez v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al, suggests related litigation or coordination between cases.
0:25-cv-62582 Altman v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
In the case Altman v. Equifax Information Services, LLC and others, the opposing party filed a response to a motion numbered 32. This means they are formally disagreeing with a request made by the other side, which could influence how the court decides on a particular issue in the case.
9:26-cv-80278 Tapia v. Equifax Information Services LLC
In the case Perez Mendez v. Equifax Information Services, LLC, a notice was filed referencing another related case, Tapia v. Equifax Information Services LLC. This notice likely introduces additional legal authority or precedent relevant to the ongoing matter. Such updates can influence the court's understanding and decision-making in the case.
9:26-cv-80228 McCarty Junior v. Equifax Information Services LLC
In the case Perez Mendez v. Equifax Information Services, a related case titled McCarty Junior v. Equifax Information Services LLC was referenced through a Notice of Supplemental Authority. This means the court was informed about additional legal information or precedent from the McCarty case that could influence the decision in the Perez Mendez case. Such updates help ensure the court considers the most current and relevant legal arguments.
Press Coverage
1:23-cv-02043 FRAZIER v. Equifax Information Services LLC
Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ( 64
1:25-cv-25312 Perez Mendez v. Equifax Information Services, LLC
Extension of Time of Discovery Cutoff Deadline ( 19
7:26-cv-01232 Gaynor v. Equifax Information Services LLC et al
Answer to Complaint ( 26
1:25-cv-21595 Moore v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
Notice (Other) ( 159
1:26-cv-22554 Hercovich Montalba v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
Clerk's Notice to Filer - ELECTRONIC CASE, SUMMONS(ES)
2:26-cv-14122 Selph v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, et al
Notice of Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions ( 8
0:25-cv-62309 Rodriguez v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal ( 48
0:25-cv-62582 Altman v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
in Opposition to Motion ( 32 )
9:26-cv-80278 Tapia v. Equifax Information Services LLC
Notice of Supplemental Authority ( 12
9:26-cv-80228 McCarty Junior v. Equifax Information Services LLC
Notice of Supplemental Authority ( 10
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 12 articles
Timeline events
12 records on file
Last updated
3 days, 21 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.