legal-news

1:25-cv-11283 Sakowski v. Trans Union, LLC et al

25-cv-11283 Filed
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Sakowski v. Trans Union, LLC et al is a civil case involving the plaintiff and a credit reporting agency. No current summary details are available, indicating limited public procedural updates. The case likely concerns issues related to credit reporting, consumer rights, or data accuracy. Without further information, the case appears to be in early stages or under administrative review. The involvement of Trans Union suggests potential claims under consumer protection laws.

Stage

Active litigation

Timeline

9 events

Coverage

9 articles

Sources

1

Key Issues

  • Credit reporting dispute
  • Consumer protection
  • Civil litigation
Advertisement

Case Timeline

9 events
info
Other April 14, 2026

1:26-cv-21911 Harding v. Transunion LLC et al

In the case Harding v. TransUnion LLC, the defendant has filed an official response to the plaintiff's complaint. This step is crucial as it allows the defendant to address the allegations and present their side of the story. It moves the legal process forward by clarifying the issues in dispute.

info
Other April 14, 2026

1:25-cv-25387 Johnson v. Trans Union LLC et al

A status conference was held in the case Johnson v. Trans Union LLC et al, which is related to the case Sakowski v. Trans Union, LLC et al. This meeting allowed the judge and the parties to discuss the progress of the case and plan the next steps. It matters because it helps ensure the case moves forward efficiently and any issues are addressed early.

info
Other April 14, 2026

0:26-cv-60083 Mata v. Trans Union LLC et al

In the case Mata v. Trans Union LLC et al, the court clerk recorded an entry related to the default status of the defendant, which means the court noted whether the defendant failed to respond to the lawsuit. This procedural step is important because it determines if the plaintiff can request a default judgment against the defendant for not responding on time.

info
Motion April 13, 2026

0:25-cv-60772 Gilead v. Trans Union, LLC et al

In the case Sakowski v. Trans Union, LLC et al, a reply was filed supporting a motion related to another case, Gilead v. Trans Union, LLC et al. This indicates ongoing legal arguments where one party is reinforcing their position to persuade the court. Such filings are crucial as they help clarify the issues and influence the judge's decision.

info
Other April 13, 2026

1:26-cv-20459 Walker v. Trans Union LLC et al

In the case of Walker v. Trans Union LLC, the defendant filed an official response to the plaintiff's complaint. This step is crucial as it outlines the defendant's position and defenses against the allegations made. It moves the case forward by clarifying the issues to be resolved.

info
Other April 13, 2026

1:25-cv-11283 Sakowski v. Trans Union, LLC et al

A new case titled Sakowski v. Trans Union, LLC et al was filed under the number 1:25-cv-11283. This marks the official start of legal proceedings where the plaintiff, Sakowski, is bringing claims against Trans Union and possibly other defendants. It matters because it initiates the judicial process that will address the issues raised by the plaintiff.

info
Other April 13, 2026

0:25-cv-62438 Hilt v. Trans Union LLC et al

In the case Sakowski v. Trans Union, LLC et al, the court granted an extension of time related to the separate but related case Hilt v. Trans Union LLC et al. This means one or both parties were given more time to meet a deadline, which can affect how the cases proceed. Extensions are common and help ensure fairness by allowing adequate time for preparation.

info
Other April 13, 2026

0:25-cv-62048 Boudreau v. Trans Union, LLC et al

In the case of Boudreau v. Trans Union, LLC et al, the parties have filed a Notice of Settlement, indicating that they have reached an agreement to resolve the dispute outside of court. This means the case is likely to be dismissed or resolved without further litigation. Such settlements help save time and resources for both the court and the parties involved.

gavel
Order April 13, 2026

1:25-cv-23235 Gordon v. Transunion LLC. et al

In the case Gordon v. TransUnion LLC, the court issued an order regarding a Motion for Protective Order. This means the court decided on a request to limit or control the sharing of certain information during the legal process. Such orders help protect sensitive information from being disclosed unnecessarily.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

9 articles