legal-news

Morancy v. Curio Employer LLC et al

25-cv-62359
Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Morancy filed suit against Curio Employer LLC and others, with the court granting an order on a motion for extension of time to file responsive pleadings. The case is in early procedural stages, focusing on scheduling and response deadlines.

Latest development

0:25-cv-62359 Morancy v. Curio Employer LLC et al

Order · April 13, 2026

The court issued an order regarding a request to extend the deadline for filing a response, reply, or answer in the case Morancy v. Curio Employer LLC et al. This means one party asked for more time to submit their legal documents, and the court has officially addressed that request. Such extensions can impact the timeline of the case and ensure all parties have adequate time to prepare their arguments.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • Employment or contractual dispute
  • Extension of time for pleadings
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
gavel
Order April 13, 2026

0:25-cv-62359 Morancy v. Curio Employer LLC et al

The court issued an order regarding a request to extend the deadline for filing a response, reply, or answer in the case Morancy v. Curio Employer LLC et al. This means one party asked for more time to submit their legal documents, and the court has officially addressed that request. Such extensions can impact the timeline of the case and ensure all parties have adequate time to prepare their arguments.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

3 days, 19 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.