legal-news

Dixon v. Exact Billing Solutions, LLC et al

25-cv-61247
Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Dixon has brought a case against Exact Billing Solutions, LLC and others. Recent court orders address motions for extensions of time to file responses or replies, indicating active case management and pending pleadings. The underlying claims are not described.

Latest development

0:25-cv-61247 Dixon v. Exact Billing Solutions, LLC et al

Order · April 14, 2026

The court issued an order granting more time for one party to file their response, reply, or answer in the case Dixon v. Exact Billing Solutions, LLC et al. This extension allows the party additional time to prepare their legal documents, ensuring they can adequately present their arguments. It helps maintain fairness in the legal process by preventing rushed or incomplete filings.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • Filing deadlines
  • Response motions
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
gavel
Order April 14, 2026

0:25-cv-61247 Dixon v. Exact Billing Solutions, LLC et al

The court issued an order granting more time for one party to file their response, reply, or answer in the case Dixon v. Exact Billing Solutions, LLC et al. This extension allows the party additional time to prepare their legal documents, ensuring they can adequately present their arguments. It helps maintain fairness in the legal process by preventing rushed or incomplete filings.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

3 days, 19 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.