legal-news

Zhosef Ovsepyan v. Pamela Bondi et al

26-cv-00664
Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Zhoslef Ovsepyan v. Pamela Bondi et al is a pending case with an unknown court. The docket number is 26-cv-00664. The current summary is not available.

Latest development

4:26-cv-00664 Sainz Reyes et al v. Bondi

Order · April 30, 2026

The court issued an order.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • • Unknown court
  • • Pending case
  • • Docket number 26-cv-00664
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

2 events
gavel
Order 2 days ago
The court issued an order.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Stipulation and Proposed Order ( 21

Open original open_in_new
arrow_upward
Appeal 3 days ago
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has accepted an appeal in the case of Zhosef Ovsepyan v. Pamela Bondi et al, which was originally filed as 5:25-cv-02578. This appeal is significant because it will allow the appellate court to review the lo
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ( 21

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

6 events
gavel
Order April 30, 2026

4:26-cv-00664 Sainz Reyes et al v. Bondi

The court issued an order.

description View filing open_in_new
info
Other April 29, 2026

8:26-cv-00664 The ADAR 2 Trust Dated 3/18/2009 v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc. et al

The court dismissed the case The ADAR 2 Trust Dated 3/18/2009 v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc. et al. The case was previously filed in Zhosef Ovsepyan v. Pamela Bondi et al. This dismissal means the lawsuit against Porsche Cars North America, Inc. and others has been terminated.

description View filing open_in_new
info
Other April 28, 2026

2:26-cv-02062 Kai Peng v. Pam Bondi et al

The court has confirmed service of a summons and complaint on the United States Attorney General, Pamela Bondi, in the case of Kai Peng v. Pam Bondi et al. This means that the plaintiff has successfully delivered the court documents to the defendant, allowing the case to proceed. The service was returned executed, indicating that the documents were properly served.

description View filing open_in_new
arrow_upward
Appeal April 28, 2026

5:25-cv-02578 Laura Beatriz Punina Chimbolema v. Pamela Bondi et al

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has accepted an appeal in the case of Zhosef Ovsepyan v. Pamela Bondi et al, which was originally filed as 5:25-cv-02578. This appeal is significant because it will allow the appellate court to review the lower court's decision. The appeal is likely to focus on the merits of the case and the application of relevant laws.

description View filing open_in_new
info
Other April 28, 2026

3:26-cv-00664 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAG FABRIC AND YARN SALES, LLC. et al

The court has been notified of a request for Clerk's Entry of Default in the case of United States of America v. Jag Fabric and Yarn Sales, LLC et al. This means that the defendants have failed to respond to the lawsuit, and the plaintiff is seeking a default judgment. The request will now be reviewed by the court.

description View filing open_in_new
info
Other April 24, 2026

5:26-cv-00664 Zhosef Ovsepyan v. Pamela Bondi et al

The court denied Zhosef Ovsepyan's motion in the case of Zhosef Ovsepyan v. Pamela Bondi et al (5:26-cv-00664). This decision means that the motion will not be granted, and the case will proceed as previously scheduled. The court's ruling has significant implications for the case's trajectory.

description View filing open_in_new
Advertisement
show_chart

Coverage Timeline

newspaper

Press Coverage

6 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

3 outlets · 6 articles

Timeline events

6 records on file

Last updated

2 days, 1 hour ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.