legal-news

Yanyun Industrial Limited v. United States Customs and Border Protection et al

25-cv-62647
Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Yanyun Industrial Limited v. United States Customs and Border Protection et al is a case where the court set aside a default judgment. The case is currently ongoing, with no further information available. The court's decision to set aside the default judgment suggests that the parties may be working towards a resolution.

Latest development

0:25-cv-62647 Yanyun Industrial Limited v. United States Customs and Border Protection et al

Order · April 21, 2026

The court set aside the default judgment against Yanyun Industrial Limited in the case against the United States Customs and Border Protection. This means the company will no longer be automatically liable for the claims made against it. The default judgment has been vacated, allowing the case to proceed.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • default judgment
  • set aside
  • ongoing case
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
gavel
Order April 21, 2026

0:25-cv-62647 Yanyun Industrial Limited v. United States Customs and Border Protection et al

The court set aside the default judgment against Yanyun Industrial Limited in the case against the United States Customs and Border Protection. This means the company will no longer be automatically liable for the claims made against it. The default judgment has been vacated, allowing the case to proceed.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

19 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.