legal-news

XpertUniverse, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

17-cv-03848
Active Initial filing stage Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

XpertUniverse, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc. is a civil case. The parties have filed a Pro Hac Vice motion, which may indicate they are seeking to bring in an expert witness or to have a lawyer from another state represent them in the case. The case has a docket number of 17-cv-03848, but the court is unknown. This suggests that the parties are seeking to expand their representation or bring in additional expertise.

Latest development

2:25-cv-01132 Congruent Media Resourcing LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

Filing · April 23, 2026

A Notice of Filing of Patent was filed.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • Pro Hac Vice motion
  • expert witness
  • lawyer from another state
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
description
Filing 1 day ago
A Notice of Filing of Patent was filed.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120) ( 12

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
description
Filing April 23, 2026

2:25-cv-01132 Congruent Media Resourcing LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

A Notice of Filing of Patent was filed.

info
Other April 22, 2026

3:17-cv-03848 XpertUniverse, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

The court granted a motion to allow Cisco Systems, Inc. to have an attorney from outside the state of California appear in the case. This is known as a Pro Hac Vice motion. The attorney will be allowed to participate in the case despite not being a member of the California bar.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

17 hours, 56 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.