Woytko v. FabFitFun Inc.
Case Summary
The court granted an extension of time for the defendant to file an answer in the case Pedro Angel Robles Garcia v. Gerordo et al, docket number 5:25-cv-02616. This means the defendant has more time to respond to the complaint, delaying the next phase of litigation. The extension could affect the case schedule and strategy for both parties.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Docket Snapshot
Court
W.D. Wash.
Western District of Washington · 9th Circuit · WA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
5:25-cv-02616 Pedro Angel Robles Garcia v. Gerordo et al
Other · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
4 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Western District of Washington, a federal district court in WA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes FabFitFun Inc, 5:25-cv-02616 Pedro Angel Robles Garcia and others.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
Western District of Washington (W.D. Wash.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, WA.
Case Timeline
2 events5:25-cv-02616 Pedro Angel Robles Garcia v. Gerordo et al
The court granted an extension of time for the defendant to file an answer in the case Pedro Angel Robles Garcia v. Gerordo et al, docket number 5:25-cv-02616. This means the defendant has more time to respond to the complaint, delaying the next phase of litigation. The extension could affect the case schedule and strategy for both parties.
2:25-cv-02616 Woytko v. FabFitFun Inc
The court updated the case status by setting or clearing procedural flags in Woytko v. FabFitFun Inc, docket number 2:25-cv-02616. This administrative action adjusts how the case is tracked or managed in the court system. It does not reflect a substantive ruling but affects case processing.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
50 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.