R. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Case Summary
The case R. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al was filed under docket number 3:26-cv-04381. The event type is marked as 'other,' indicating a procedural or administrative action without further details provided. Without additional information, the specific development or impact on the litigation remains unclear.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Docket Snapshot
Court
N.D. Cal.
Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
3:26-cv-04381 R. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Other · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
2 Defendants, 1 Related Organization
5 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Uber Technologies, Inc, Uber Technologies Inc and others.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
2 events3:26-cv-04381 R. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
The case R. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al was filed under docket number 3:26-cv-04381. The event type is marked as 'other,' indicating a procedural or administrative action without further details provided. Without additional information, the specific development or impact on the litigation remains unclear.
1:24-cv-11917 Cohran v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al
The court granted Uber Technologies Inc. and co-defendants extra time to file a required document in the case Cohran v. Uber Technologies Inc., docket number 1:24-cv-11917. This delay could affect the case timeline and the parties' ability to respond promptly. Lawyers should watch for how this extension impacts upcoming deadlines.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
39 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.