newspaper
legal-news
Williams v. Guevara et al
25-cv-13620
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
The court has denied a motion in the case of Hernandez v. Guevara, et al. (1:23-cv-15375), which is related to Williams v. This decision means that the motion will not be heard by the court. The motion's details are not specified in the provided information.
Latest development
8:23-cr-00150-2 USA v. Uehara, et., al.
Hearing · April 28, 2026
The court held a PSA bond revocation hearing in the case of USA v. Uehara, et al. The hearing was related to the case Williams v. Guevara et al, but the details of the connection are unclear. The outcome of the hearing is not specified.
description View filing
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
update What Changed This Week
2 events
groups
Hearing
10 hours ago
The court held a PSA bond revocation hearing in the case of USA v. Uehara, et al. The hearing was related to the case Williams v. Guevara et al, but the details of the connection are unclear. The outcome of the hearing is not specified.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
PSA Bond Revocation Hearing
Open original open_in_new
groups
Hearing
1 day ago
A Notice of Rescheduled Hearing was filed.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Notice of Rescheduled Hearing
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
7 events
info
Other
April 28, 2026
1:23-cv-15375 Hernandez v. Guevara, et al.
The court has denied a motion in the case of Hernandez v. Guevara, et al. (1:23-cv-15375), which is related to Williams v. This decision means that the motion will not be heard by the court. The motion's details are not specified in the provided information.
info
Other
April 28, 2026
1:24-cv-11057 Ortiz v. Guevara et al
The court has consolidated the case of Williams v. Guevara et al with Ortiz v. Guevara et al, assigning the latter case the docket number 1:24-cv-11057. This consolidation will streamline the proceedings and allow the court to manage the cases more efficiently. The consolidation is significant because it will impact the scheduling and management of the cases going forward.
info
Other
April 28, 2026
1:24-cv-11278 Rosario et al v. Guevara et al
The court granted a motion to consolidate the case of Williams v. Guevara et al with Rosario et al v. Guevara et al, effectively combining the two cases under a single docket number. This decision will streamline the litigation process and reduce costs for all parties involved. The consolidation will also allow the court to more efficiently manage the cases and make a more informed decision.
info
Other
April 28, 2026
1:24-cv-12554 Soto v. Guevara et al
The court has allowed a new case, Soto v. Guevara et al, to proceed, which is related to the ongoing Williams v. Guevara et al case. This decision will likely impact the outcome of the Williams case. The exact details of the Soto case are not yet clear.
groups
Hearing
April 28, 2026
8:23-cr-00150-2 USA v. Uehara, et., al.
The court held a PSA bond revocation hearing in the case of USA v. Uehara, et al. The hearing was related to the case Williams v. Guevara et al, but the details of the connection are unclear. The outcome of the hearing is not specified.
groups
Hearing
April 27, 2026
3:26-cr-05072-1 USA vs Williams
A Notice of Rescheduled Hearing was filed.
info
Other
April 27, 2026
1:25-cv-13620 Williams v. Guevara et al
The court granted a motion to seal a document in the Williams v. Guevara et al case (1:25-cv-13620). This means that the document will be kept confidential and not publicly available. The court's decision allows the parties to protect sensitive information.
Advertisement
newspaper
7 articles
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
3 outlets · 7 articles
Timeline events
7 records on file
Last updated
10 hours, 4 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.