WILKINS v. USA
Case Summary
The court has allowed a third-party case, Wolf et al v. Amazon.com, Inc., to proceed in the same jurisdiction as Wilkins v. USA. This decision may impact the outcome of Wilkins v. USA, as the two cases share similar issues. The court's ruling could set a precedent for future cases involving Amazon.com, Inc.
Latest development
1:26-cv-01479 WILKINS v. USA
Verdict · April 29, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingupdate What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255)
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
4 events2:26-cv-01479 Wolf et al v. Amazon.com, Inc.
The court has allowed a third-party case, Wolf et al v. Amazon.com, Inc., to proceed in the same jurisdiction as Wilkins v. USA. This decision may impact the outcome of Wilkins v. USA, as the two cases share similar issues. The court's ruling could set a precedent for future cases involving Amazon.com, Inc.
1:26-cv-01479 WILKINS v. USA
A Motion was filed.
1:19-cr-00390-1 USA v. WILKINS
The court denied defendant Wilkins' motion to suppress evidence obtained from a search warrant. The warrant was issued based on probable cause, and the court found that the search was lawful. This decision allows the prosecution to use the evidence against Wilkins in the upcoming trial.
1:19-cr-00390-1 USA v. WILKINS
The court denied defendant Wilkins' motion to suppress evidence obtained from a search warrant. The warrant was issued based on probable cause, and the court found that the search was lawful. This decision allows the prosecution to use the evidence against Wilkins in the upcoming trial.
Press Coverage
1:26-cv-01479 WILKINS v. USA
Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255)
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 3 articles
Timeline events
4 records on file
Last updated
4 days, 21 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.