appeal court-watch federal-courts hearing ruling settlement verdict

Bayer Appeals $1.25 Million Verdict in Roundup Lawsuit

Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Bayer is appealing a $1.25 million verdict in a Roundup lawsuit. The case is being heard in the Missouri Court of Appeals. The verdict is part of a larger settlement of $7.25 billion for nationwide Roundup claims.

Latest development

What Bayer U . S . Supreme Court case means for the thousands of Roundup lawsuits

Media Coverage · April 27, 2026

The parties reported a settlement.

newspaper Read article

Key Issues

  • Roundup lawsuit
  • Bayer appeal
  • Missouri Court of Appeals
  • Roundup settlement
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
newspaper
Media Coverage 5 days ago
The parties reported a settlement.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

reuters//April 26, 2026// reuters//April 26, 2026// - Bayer appeals $1.25 million verdict in Missouri Court of Appeals - Supreme Court to decide federal pesticide law preemption - Bayer reached $7.25 billion settlement for nationwide Roundup claims - 65,000 plaintiffs allege non-Hodgkin lymphoma from Roundup exposure The U.S. Supreme Court hears arguments on April 27 in Bayer’s bid to limit thousands of lawsuits alleging that the German company’s Roundup weedkiller causes cancer in a case that i

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
newspaper
Media Coverage April 27, 2026

What Bayer U . S . Supreme Court case means for the thousands of Roundup lawsuits

The parties reported a settlement.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

5 days, 2 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.