2:25-cv-09554 Arpine Stepanyan v. Pamela Bondi et al
Voluntary Dismissal of a Case (Pursuant to FRCP 41a (1)) ( 12
The case of Arpine Stepanyan v. Pamela Bondi et al has been voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiff. This means that the plaintiff has chosen to end the lawsuit without a court decision. The dismissal is effective immediately.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
The case of Arpine Stepanyan v. Pamela Bondi et al has been voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiff. This means that the plaintiff has chosen to end the lawsuit without a court decision. The dismissal is effective immediately.
The court issued a scheduling notice in the case of Wenying Chen v. Pam Bondi et al, informing the parties of upcoming deadlines and procedures. This notice is a routine step in the litigation process, helping to manage the case's timeline and ensure that all parties are aware of their obligations. The notice does not indicate any significant developments in the case.
Voluntary Dismissal of a Case (Pursuant to FRCP 41a (1)) ( 12
Text Only Scheduling Notice
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
4 days, 12 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.