legal-news

Mohsen Kashnay Nassab v. Kristi Lynn Arnold Noem

25-cv-02623
Active Hearing stage Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

A hearing was set or reset in the case of Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. African Development Foundation, case number 1:25-cv-02623. This hearing is part of a larger lawsuit. The exact details of the hearing are not specified.

Latest development

1:25-cv-02623 JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. U.S. AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION

Hearing · May 1, 2026

A hearing was set or reset in the case of Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. African Development Foundation, case number 1:25-cv-02623. This hearing is part of a larger lawsuit. The exact details of the hearing are not specified.

description View filing
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
groups
Hearing 2 days ago
A hearing was set or reset in the case of Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. African Development Foundation, case number 1:25-cv-02623. This hearing is part of a larger lawsuit. The exact details of the hearing are not specified.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

~Util - Set/Reset Hearings

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
groups
Hearing May 1, 2026

1:25-cv-02623 JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. U.S. AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION

A hearing was set or reset in the case of Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. African Development Foundation, case number 1:25-cv-02623. This hearing is part of a larger lawsuit. The exact details of the hearing are not specified.

description View filing open_in_new
info
Other April 29, 2026

8:25-cv-02623 Mohsen Kashnay Nassab v. Kristi Lynn Arnold Noem

The plaintiff, Mohsen Kashnay Nassab, voluntarily dismissed his case against Kristi Lynn Arnold Noem. This dismissal was made pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), which allows a plaintiff to dismiss their own case without a court order. The case, 8:25-cv-02623, is now closed.

description View filing open_in_new
Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

2 days, 19 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.