civil-litigation federal-courts court-watch

WEINGER v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION et al

25-cv-17388 D.N.J.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The court filed a witness list in the case Sudunagunta v. Costco Wholesale Corporation, docket number 9:25-cv-81569. This document identifies the individuals expected to testify at trial or in hearings. Knowing the witnesses helps both sides prepare their strategies and anticipate the evidence.

Latest development

2:25-cv-17388 WEINGER v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION et al

Order · May 11, 2026

The court issued an order.

description View filing
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

D.N.J.

District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

9:25-cv-81569 Sudunagunta v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Other · May 11, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

2 Defendants, 1 Plaintiff

4 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 11, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, Costco Wholesale Corporation, 9:25-cv-81569 Sudunagunta and others.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 5 hours, 17 minutes ago

WEINGER v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION et al is an active civil case in the District of New Jersey, docket number 25-cv-17388. The case involves plaintiff Weinger suing Costco Wholesale Corporation and other defendants.

The court has not yet assigned a judge. The case is in its early stages, with the most recent docket entry on May 11, 2026, reflecting a court order related to scheduling. The details of the claims and defenses remain under seal or have not been publicly disclosed.

The court issued a scheduling order to set deadlines for discovery and motions, signaling the case is moving toward fact-finding and pretrial preparation. The absence of a judge assignment suggests the court is still organizing the case's management.

Watch for the appointment of a judge and the filing of initial pleadings or motions, which will clarify the parties' positions and the legal issues at stake. The scheduling order will guide the timeline for discovery and dispositive motions, shaping the pace of litigation going forward.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
gavel
Order 6 hours ago
The court issued an order.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Scheduling Order ( 12

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

About This Court

District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other May 11, 2026

9:25-cv-81569 Sudunagunta v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

The court filed a witness list in the case Sudunagunta v. Costco Wholesale Corporation, docket number 9:25-cv-81569. This document identifies the individuals expected to testify at trial or in hearings. Knowing the witnesses helps both sides prepare their strategies and anticipate the evidence.

gavel
Order May 11, 2026

2:25-cv-17388 WEINGER v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION et al

The court issued an order.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

3 hours, 46 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.