2:26-cv-05045 v. AUDELO HERNANDEZ et al
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( 1
A writ of habeas corpus was filed in the case of Walker v. Tech Gear 5.7 Inc. against Audelo Hernandez et al. This petition seeks to challenge the detention or imprisonment of the defendants, citing potential constitutional or legal issues. The outcome of this petition will determine whether the defendants' detention is lawful.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
D.N.J.
District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:26-cv-05045 v. AUDELO HERNANDEZ et al
Other · May 05, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
2 Defendants
4 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Tech Gear 5.7 Inc, AUDELO HERNANDEZ and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.
A writ of habeas corpus was filed in the case of Walker v. Tech Gear 5.7 Inc. against Audelo Hernandez et al. This petition seeks to challenge the detention or imprisonment of the defendants, citing potential constitutional or legal issues. The outcome of this petition will determine whether the defendants' detention is lawful.
The court granted a motion to seal documents in the case of Walker v. Tech Gear 5.7 Inc. (1:26-cv-05045). This decision allows the parties to keep certain information confidential. The sealing of documents is often used to protect sensitive business information or trade secrets.
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( 1
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 5 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.