2:26-cv-05098 ALVES ROCHA COELHO v. SOTO et al
Temporary Restraining Order ( 2
The court granted a petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus in Krasawski v. Plummer, allowing Krasawski to challenge the legality of their detention. This decision gives Krasawski an opportunity to present their case to the court and potentially secure their release. The writ will be served to the relevant authorities, who must then respond to the petition.
Latest development
Order · May 6, 2026
The court issued an order.
description View filingCourt
N.D. Ill.
Northern District of Illinois · 7th Circuit · IL
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:26-cv-05098 ALVES ROCHA COELHO v. SOTO et al
Order · May 06, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
2 Plaintiffs
4 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Northern District of Illinois, a federal district court in IL.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 06, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes 1:26-cv-05098 Krasawski, 2:26-cv-05098 ALVES ROCHA COELHO and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
Temporary Restraining Order ( 2
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Northern District of Illinois (N.D. Ill.) is a federal district court in the 7th Circuit, IL.
The court issued an order.
The court granted a petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus in Krasawski v. Plummer, allowing Krasawski to challenge the legality of their detention. This decision gives Krasawski an opportunity to present their case to the court and potentially secure their release. The writ will be served to the relevant authorities, who must then respond to the petition.
Temporary Restraining Order ( 2
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( 1
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
23 hours, 42 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.