1:26-cv-03767 Connex One, Inc. v. Complete Senior Benefits, LLC
Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement ( 3
The court has received a stipulation filed by Connex One, Inc. in the case of 1:26-cv-03767, which is a separate case from Velasco v. Givaudan Roure Corporation et al. The stipulation is related to a Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement, which requires companies to disclose certain information about their corporate structure. This filing is a routine matter that does not directly impact the Velasco case.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
D.N.J.
District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:26-cv-03767 Connex One, Inc. v. Complete Senior Benefits, LLC
Other · May 06, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
2 Defendants, 1 Plaintiff
4 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 06, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes GIVAUDAN ROURE CORPORATION, Complete Senior Benefits, LLC, 1:26-cv-03767 Connex One, Inc and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.
The court has received a stipulation filed by Connex One, Inc. in the case of 1:26-cv-03767, which is a separate case from Velasco v. Givaudan Roure Corporation et al. The stipulation is related to a Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement, which requires companies to disclose certain information about their corporate structure. This filing is a routine matter that does not directly impact the Velasco case.
The parties filed a joint stipulation.
Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement ( 3
Stipulation ( 6
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 3 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.