3:26-cv-04029 S. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Certificate of Interested Entities, Corporate Disclosure Statement, or Rule 7.1 Disclosures ( 3
The court has received a Certificate of Interested Entities, Corporate Disclosure Statement, or Rule 7.1 Disclosures from Uber Technologies, Inc. and other defendants in the case S. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al. This filing is a routine disclosure required by the court to identify potential conflicts of interest. The filing does not indicate any significant developments in the case.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
N.D. Cal.
Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
3:26-cv-04029 S. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Other · May 04, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Related Organization
3 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 04, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Uber Technologies, Inc and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
The court has received a Certificate of Interested Entities, Corporate Disclosure Statement, or Rule 7.1 Disclosures from Uber Technologies, Inc. and other defendants in the case S. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al. This filing is a routine disclosure required by the court to identify potential conflicts of interest. The filing does not indicate any significant developments in the case.
Certificate of Interested Entities, Corporate Disclosure Statement, or Rule 7.1 Disclosures ( 3
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 day, 8 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.