Valentine et al v. Crocs, Inc.

description

Case Summary

In the Northern District of California case Valentine et al v. Crocs, Inc., an administrative motion was filed under Civil Local Rule 7-11. Details of the motion were not disclosed in the summary.

Latest development

3:22-cv-07463 Valentine et al v. Crocs, Inc.

Motion · May 9, 2026

A Motion was filed.

description View filing

Key Issues

• • Administrative motion
• • Local rule compliance

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

N.D. Cal.

Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Motion practice

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

3:22-cv-07463 Valentine et al v. Crocs, Inc.

Motion · May 09, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

Parties not parsed yet

1 linked entity

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a motion dated May 09, 2026.

Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

update What Changed This Week

1 event

edit_note

Motion 3 days ago

A Motion was filed.

receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Administrative Motion per Civil Local Rule 7-11 ( 203

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

About This Court

Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Case Timeline

1 event

edit_note

Motion May 9, 2026

3:22-cv-07463 Valentine et al v. Crocs, Inc.

A Motion was filed.

description View filing open_in_new