criminal-case criminal-law federal-courts

USA v. Torres-Molina: Arraignment Held

26-cr-00169 S.D.N.Y.
Active Initial filing stage Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The arraignment in USA v. Torres-Molina was held on an indictment. The indictment charges Torres-Molina with a crime. The arraignment is a formal reading of the charges.

Latest development

1:26-cr-00169-1 USA v. Patterson

Filing · May 6, 2026

The arraignment in USA v. Torres-Molina was held on an indictment. The indictment charges Torres-Molina with a crime. The arraignment is a formal reading of the charges.

description View filing
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

S.D.N.Y.

Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY

tag

Docket

Not captured

Criminal

timeline

Stage

Initial filing stage

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:26-cr-00169-1 USA v. Patterson

Filing · May 06, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

2 articles

2 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant

3 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.

The newest docket activity we have is a filing dated May 06, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Torres-Molina and others.

Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 1 day, 7 hours ago

USA v. Torres-Molina: Arraignment Held is an active criminal matter in Southern District of New York under docket 26-cr-00169.

The main identified defendant or respondent is Torres-Molina. Juryvine classifies the matter around criminal case, criminal law, federal courts.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On May 6, 2026, the docket recorded a filing: The arraignment in USA v. Torres-Molina was held on an indictment. The indictment charges Torres-Molina with a crime.

The arraignment is a formal reading of the charges. On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The defendant, Torres-Molina, appeared in court for an arraignment in the case USA v. Torres-Molina (1:26-cr-00169-1).

The arraignment is a formal proceeding where the defendant is informed of the charges against them and enters a plea. This event marks the.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest filing produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

About This Court

Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
description
Filing May 6, 2026

1:26-cr-00169-1 USA v. Patterson

The arraignment in USA v. Torres-Molina was held on an indictment. The indictment charges Torres-Molina with a crime. The arraignment is a formal reading of the charges.

info
Other May 5, 2026

1:26-cr-00169-1 USA v. Torres-Molina

The defendant, Torres-Molina, appeared in court for an arraignment in the case USA v. Torres-Molina (1:26-cr-00169-1). The arraignment is a formal proceeding where the defendant is informed of the charges against them and enters a plea. This event marks the beginning of the formal court process.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

1 day, 7 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.