1:16-cr-00169-5 USA v. PROCTOR et al
Notice of Attorney Appearance - Defendant ( 642
The United States brought criminal charges against Proctor and others in the District of Columbia. A notice of attorney appearance was filed for the defendant, marking a formal step in the criminal defense process.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
D.D.C.
District of Columbia · D.C. Circuit · DC
Docket
Not captured
Criminal
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:16-cr-00169-5 USA v. PROCTOR et al
Other · May 05, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
1 linked entity
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to District of Columbia, a federal district court in DC.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
USA v. PROCTOR et al is an active criminal matter in District of Columbia under docket 16-cr-00169.
The case is currently organized around Criminal charges and procedural posture, Charge status, plea posture, and court supervision, Current docket activity and next procedural step.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A Notice of Attorney Appearance was filed.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
District of Columbia (D.D.C.) is a federal district court in the D.C. Circuit, DC.
A Notice of Attorney Appearance was filed.
Notice of Attorney Appearance - Defendant ( 642
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
2 days, 15 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.