1:16-cr-00169-5 USA v. PROCTOR et al
Notice of Attorney Appearance - Defendant ( 642
The United States filed a criminal case against PROCTOR and others under docket 16-cr-00169. The recent filing includes a notice of attorney appearance for a defendant, indicating ongoing defense activity in a federal criminal matter.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Criminal
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:16-cr-00169-5 USA v. PROCTOR et al
Other · May 05, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
1 linked entity
Judge
Not assigned in feed
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
USA v. PROCTOR et al is an active criminal matter under docket 16-cr-00169.
The case is currently organized around Criminal charges and procedural posture, Charge status, plea posture, and court supervision, Current docket activity and next procedural step.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A Notice of Attorney Appearance was filed.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
A Notice of Attorney Appearance was filed.
Notice of Attorney Appearance - Defendant ( 642
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
2 days, 13 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.