2:25-cr-00695-5 USA v. Ponce De Leon, et al
Manual Filing (G-92) ( 90
The United States filed a criminal case against Ponce De Leon and others in the Central District of California, docket number 25-cr-00695. The case record includes a manual filing (G-92), but no further details on charges or proceedings are available.
Stage
Initial filing stage
Timeline
5 events
Coverage
5 articles
Sources
1
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Criminal
Stage
Initial filing stage
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:25-cr-00695-5 USA v. Ponce De Leon, et al
Filing · May 08, 2026
Coverage
5 articles
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
6 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a filing dated May 08, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Ponce De Leon and others.
Press monitoring has found 5 related articles from 1 distinct source.
USA v. Ponce De Leon, et al is an active criminal matter in Central District of California under docket 25-cr-00695.
The main identified defendant or respondent is Ponce De Leon. Juryvine classifies the matter around criminal case, criminal law, federal courts, court watch.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 8, 2026, the docket recorded a filing: The government filed a document in the case of USA v. Ponce De Leon, et al, with docket number 2:25-cr-00695-4. The filing was made manually, using form G-92.
This action is likely a routine procedural step in the case. The filing is a manual submission, identified as G-92. The contents of the filing are not specified.
Ponce De Leon, et al, case number 2:25-cr-00695-2. The filing was made manually, using a paper form, and was received by the court on a specific date. This filing is likely a procedural step in the ongoing.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest filing produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Manual Filing (G-92) ( 90
Open original open_in_newManual Filing (G-92) ( 90
Open original open_in_newManual Filing (G-92) ( 90
Open original open_in_newManual Filing (G-92) ( 90
Open original open_in_newManual Filing (G-92) ( 90
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
The government filed a document in the case of USA v. Ponce De Leon, et al, with docket number 2:25-cr-00695-5. The filing was made manually, using form G-92. This action is likely a routine court filing.
The government filed a document in the case of USA v. Ponce De Leon, et al, with docket number 2:25-cr-00695-4. The filing was made manually, using form G-92. This action is likely a routine procedural step in the case.
The government filed a document in the case of USA v. Ponce De Leon, et al, with docket number 2:25-cr-00695-3. The filing was made manually, using form G-92. This action is likely a routine procedural step in the case.
The government filed a document in the case of USA v. Ponce De Leon, et al, case number 2:25-cr-00695-2. The filing was made manually, using a paper form, and was received by the court on a specific date. This filing is likely a procedural step in the ongoing case.
The government filed a document in the case of USA v. Ponce De Leon, et al, with docket number 2:25-cr-00695-1. The filing is a manual submission, identified as G-92. The contents of the filing are not specified.
Manual Filing (G-92) ( 90
Manual Filing (G-92) ( 90
Manual Filing (G-92) ( 90
Manual Filing (G-92) ( 90
Manual Filing (G-92) ( 90
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 5 articles
Timeline events
5 records on file
Last updated
6 hours, 10 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.