legal-news

USA v. Partida: Manual Filing in 25-cr-00224

25-cr-00224
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

USA v. Partida is a criminal case. The defendant has filed a manual filing in the case. This means that the defendant has submitted a document to the court without the assistance of a lawyer. The case is currently pending in the district court.

Latest development

8:25-cr-00224-1 USA v. Partida

Filing · April 28, 2026

The government filed a document in the USA v. Partida case, which is a criminal case with the docket number 8:25-cr-00224-1. The filing was made manually, using a process designated as G-92. This filing is likely a procedural step in the case.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • manual filing
  • criminal case
  • defendant's submission
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other May 4, 2026

1:25-cr-00224-1 USA v. RODRIGUEZ

The court denied the defendant's motion to proceed with a manual filing in the case of USA v. Partida. This decision means that the defendant will not be allowed to file documents in a non-electronic format. The ruling is significant because it upholds the court's electronic filing requirements.

description
Filing April 28, 2026

8:25-cr-00224-1 USA v. Partida

The government filed a document in the USA v. Partida case, which is a criminal case with the docket number 8:25-cr-00224-1. The filing was made manually, using a process designated as G-92. This filing is likely a procedural step in the case.

Advertisement
show_chart

Coverage Timeline

newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

1 day, 15 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.