Northern District of California sets deadlines for motions in USA v. Mondragon
Case Summary
USA v. Mondragon, in the Northern District of California (docket 16-cr-00416), involves scheduling motions and setting deadlines for hearings. This criminal case is progressing through pretrial stages, with the court managing the timeline for motions and other proceedings.
Latest development
3:16-cr-00416-1 USA v. Mondragon
Hearing · May 11, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingKey Issues
- • Criminal pretrial scheduling
- • Motions and hearings deadlines
- • Federal prosecution
Docket Snapshot
Court
N.D. Cal.
Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Criminal
Stage
Hearing stage
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
3:16-cr-00416-1 USA v. Mondragon
Hearing · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
1 linked entity
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a hearing dated May 11, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Set Motion and Deadlines/Hearings
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
About This Court
Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
1 event3:16-cr-00416-1 USA v. Mondragon
A Motion was filed.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 day, 21 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.