sentencing

USA v. MIDDLETON

25-cr-00356
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The court delivered a verdict in USA v. MIDDLETON, case number 1:25-cr-00356-1. The defendant, MIDDLETON, was found guilty of the charges. The verdict marks a significant milestone in the case.

Latest development

1:25-cr-00356-1 USA v. MIDDLETON

Verdict · April 21, 2026

The court delivered a verdict in USA v. MIDDLETON, case number 1:25-cr-00356-1. The defendant, MIDDLETON, was found guilty of the charges. The verdict marks a significant milestone in the case.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • • pretrial services
  • • probation request
  • • memo
  • • summons
  • • warrant
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
verified
Verdict 11 hours ago
The court delivered a verdict in USA v. MIDDLETON, case number 1:25-cr-00356-1. The defendant, MIDDLETON, was found guilty of the charges. The verdict marks a significant milestone in the case.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Sentencing Memorandum ( 38

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other April 21, 2026

1:23-cr-10190-1 USA v. Middleton

A Summons was issued.

description View filing open_in_new
verified
Verdict April 21, 2026

1:25-cr-00356-1 USA v. MIDDLETON

The court delivered a verdict in USA v. MIDDLETON, case number 1:25-cr-00356-1. The defendant, MIDDLETON, was found guilty of the charges. The verdict marks a significant milestone in the case.

description View filing open_in_new
Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

1 hour, 27 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.