1:18-cr-00032-16 USA v. INTERNET RESEARCH AGENCY LLC et al
Case Assigned/Reassigned ( 384
The case of USA v. INTERNET RESEARCH AGENCY LLC et al was reassigned to a new judge. This change may impact the timing and direction of the case. The reassignment occurred on an unspecified date.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
D.D.C.
District of Columbia · D.C. Circuit · DC
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:18-cr-00032-15 USA v. INTERNET RESEARCH AGENCY LLC et al
Other · May 07, 2026
Coverage
16 articles
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
17 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to District of Columbia, a federal district court in DC.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 07, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes INTERNET RESEARCH AGENCY LLC and others.
Press monitoring has found 16 related articles from 1 distinct source.
District of Columbia (D.D.C.) is a federal district court in the D.C. Circuit, DC.
The case of USA v. INTERNET RESEARCH AGENCY LLC et al was reassigned to a new judge. This change may impact the timing and direction of the case. The reassignment occurred on an unspecified date.
The case of USA v. INTERNET RESEARCH AGENCY LLC et al was reassigned to a new judge. This change in assignment is a routine administrative step in the court process. The reassignment does not indicate any change in the case's status or outcome.
The case of USA v. INTERNET RESEARCH AGENCY LLC et al was reassigned to a new judge. This change in assignment is a routine administrative action that does not affect the progress of the case. The case remains ongoing.
The case of USA v. INTERNET RESEARCH AGENCY LLC et al was reassigned to a new judge. This change in assignment is a routine administrative step in the court process. The reassignment does not indicate any change in the case's status or outcome.
The case of USA v. INTERNET RESEARCH AGENCY LLC et al was reassigned to a new judge. This change may impact the case's progress and outcome. The reassignment occurred on an unspecified date.
The case of USA v. INTERNET RESEARCH AGENCY LLC et al was reassigned to a new judge. This change in assignment is a routine administrative step in the court process. The reassignment does not indicate any change in the case's status or outcome.
The case of USA v. INTERNET RESEARCH AGENCY LLC et al was reassigned. This change in assignment is a routine administrative task that does not affect the progress of the case. The case was previously assigned, but the details of the previous assignment are not specified.
The case of USA v. INTERNET RESEARCH AGENCY LLC et al was reassigned to a new judge. This change in assignment is a routine administrative step in the court process. The reassignment does not indicate any change in the case's status or outcome.
The case of USA v. INTERNET RESEARCH AGENCY LLC et al was reassigned to a new judge. This change may impact the progress of the case. The reassignment occurred on an unspecified date.
The case of USA v. INTERNET RESEARCH AGENCY LLC et al was reassigned to a new judge. This change in assignment is a routine administrative action that does not affect the progress of the case. The case remains ongoing.
The case of USA v. INTERNET RESEARCH AGENCY LLC et al was reassigned to a new judge. This change is likely due to the original judge's recusal or unavailability. The reassignment does not affect the case's status or the parties involved.
The case of USA v. INTERNET RESEARCH AGENCY LLC et al was reassigned to a new judge. This change in assignment is a routine administrative step in the court process. The reassignment does not affect the underlying case or its progress.
The case of USA v. INTERNET RESEARCH AGENCY LLC et al was reassigned to a new judge. This change in assignment is a routine administrative action that does not necessarily indicate any significant development in the case. The case remains ongoing.
The case of USA v. INTERNET RESEARCH AGENCY LLC et al was reassigned to a new judge. This change in assignment is a routine administrative action that does not affect the progress of the case. The case involves the indictment of the Internet Research Agency, a Russian troll farm, for interfering with the 2016 US presidential election.
The case of USA v. INTERNET RESEARCH AGENCY LLC et al was reassigned to a new judge. This change may impact the case's progress and outcome. The exact reason for the reassignment is not specified.
The case of USA v. INTERNET RESEARCH AGENCY LLC et al was reassigned. This means the judge overseeing the case has been changed. The case number remains the same.
Case Assigned/Reassigned ( 384
Case Assigned/Reassigned ( 384
Case Assigned/Reassigned ( 384
Case Assigned/Reassigned ( 384
Case Assigned/Reassigned ( 384
Case Assigned/Reassigned ( 384
Case Assigned/Reassigned ( 384
Case Assigned/Reassigned ( 384
Case Assigned/Reassigned ( 384
Case Assigned/Reassigned ( 384
Case Assigned/Reassigned ( 384
Case Assigned/Reassigned ( 384
Case Assigned/Reassigned ( 384
Case Assigned/Reassigned ( 384
Case Assigned/Reassigned ( 384
Case Assigned/Reassigned ( 384
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 16 articles
Timeline events
16 records on file
Last updated
1 hour, 32 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.