USA v. Hurtado
Case Summary
The court delivered a verdict in USA v. Hurtado, case number 8:25-cr-00081-1. The defendant, Hurtado, was found guilty of the charges. The verdict is significant because it brings closure to the case.
Latest development
8:25-cr-00081-1 USA v. Hurtado
Verdict · May 6, 2026
The court delivered a verdict in USA v. Hurtado, case number 8:25-cr-00081-1. The defendant, Hurtado, was found guilty of the charges. The verdict is significant because it brings closure to the case.
description View filingDocket Snapshot
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Criminal
Stage
Verdict entered
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
8:25-cr-00081-1 USA v. Hurtado
Verdict · May 06, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a verdict dated May 06, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Sentencing Memorandum ( 44
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
About This Court
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
1 event8:25-cr-00081-1 USA v. Hurtado
The court delivered a verdict in USA v. Hurtado, case number 8:25-cr-00081-1. The defendant, Hurtado, was found guilty of the charges. The verdict is significant because it brings closure to the case.
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 day ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.