District of Massachusetts Reassigns Criminal Case USA v. Castillo
Case Summary
The District of Massachusetts reassigned the criminal case USA v. Castillo, docket number 2:25-cr-00676-1. This manual filing indicates a change in the judge or courtroom handling the case. Such reassignments can affect case scheduling and strategy.
Latest development
2:25-cr-00676-1 USA v. Castillo
Filing · May 12, 2026
The District of Massachusetts reassigned the criminal case USA v. Castillo, docket number 2:25-cr-00676-1. This manual filing indicates a change in the judge or courtroom handling the case. Such reassignments can affect case scheduling and strategy.
description View filingDocket Snapshot
Court
D. Mass.
District of Massachusetts · 1st Circuit · MA
Docket
Not captured
Criminal
Stage
Initial filing stage
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:25-cr-00676-1 USA v. Castillo
Filing · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
3 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of Massachusetts, a federal district court in MA.
The newest docket activity we have is a filing dated May 12, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
The District of Massachusetts reassigned the criminal case USA v. Castillo, docket number 18-cr-40021, on May 12, 2026. The reassignment means the case will proceed under a new judge, though the court has not yet named who will take over.
The filing that triggered this change was a manual entry labeled G-92, which typically signals administrative adjustments such as judge or courtroom changes. The case remains active, but details about the charges or the defendant's status have not been publicly disclosed in this docket.
This reassignment could affect the case’s timeline, as the new judge will need time to review the record and set any upcoming hearings or deadlines. The lack of a named judge means the court is still organizing the case’s management. The reassignment notice itself is a routine procedural step but often marks a shift in how the case will be handled going forward.
The docket shows no recent substantive filings beyond the reassignment notice. Without a judge assigned, motions or trial dates have not been scheduled. The case’s next phase will depend on the new judge’s docket and priorities.
The reassignment does not indicate any change in the charges or the prosecution’s approach but resets the administrative oversight.
Observers should watch for the appointment of a judge and any initial scheduling orders. Those filings will provide insight into the court’s plan for moving the case forward. The reassignment is a necessary step before the case can proceed on the merits or reach pretrial motions.
Until then, the case remains in a holding pattern under court administration.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Manual Filing (G-92) ( 28
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
About This Court
District of Massachusetts (D. Mass.) is a federal district court in the 1st Circuit, MA.
Case Timeline
2 events2:25-cr-00676-1 USA v. Castillo
The District of Massachusetts reassigned the criminal case USA v. Castillo, docket number 2:25-cr-00676-1. This manual filing indicates a change in the judge or courtroom handling the case. Such reassignments can affect case scheduling and strategy.
4:18-cr-40021-1 USA v. Castillo
A Notice of Reassignment was filed.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
6 hours, 46 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.