legal-news

USA v. Brown et al

13-cr-00650
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The court issued a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum, allowing the US government to temporarily take custody of defendant Barton from state authorities. This writ enables the federal government to prosecute Barton in a federal court. The writ is a key step in the federal prosecution of the case.

Latest development

1:13-cr-00650-3 USA v. Brown et al

Hearing · April 29, 2026

The court terminated deadlines and hearings in the case of USA v. Brown et al, case number 1:13-cr-00650-3. This means that the scheduled deadlines and hearings are no longer in effect. The court's action likely resulted from a request by one or more parties involved in the case.

description View filing
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other April 29, 2026

6:20-cr-00067-3 USA v. BARTON ET AL

The court issued a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum, allowing the US government to temporarily take custody of defendant Barton from state authorities. This writ enables the federal government to prosecute Barton in a federal court. The writ is a key step in the federal prosecution of the case.

groups
Hearing April 29, 2026

1:13-cr-00650-3 USA v. Brown et al

The court terminated deadlines and hearings in the case of USA v. Brown et al, case number 1:13-cr-00650-3. This means that the scheduled deadlines and hearings are no longer in effect. The court's action likely resulted from a request by one or more parties involved in the case.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

2 days, 23 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.