newspaper
criminal-case
criminal-law
federal-courts
Motions referred in USA v. Braga criminal case in Western District of Washington
22-cr-00169
W.D. Wash.
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
The court referred motions in the case of USA v. Braga (2:22-cr-00169-1) to a magistrate judge. This means that the main judge has delegated the responsibility of handling the motions to a subordinate judge. The magistrate judge will now review and decide on the motions.
Latest development
2:22-cr-00169-1 USA v. Braga
Motion · May 4, 2026
The court referred motions in the case of USA v. Braga (2:22-cr-00169-1) to a magistrate judge. This means that the main judge has delegated the responsibility of handling the motions to a subordinate judge. The magistrate judge will now review and decide on the motions.
description View filingKey Issues
- • Motions Referred
- • USA v. Braga
- • ongoing case
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
fact_check
Docket Snapshot
account_balance
Court
W.D. Wash.
Western District of Washington · 9th Circuit · WA
tag
Docket
Not captured
Criminal
timeline
Stage
Motion practice
Active
event
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
new_releases
Latest Filing
2:22-cr-00169-1 USA v. Braga
Motion · May 04, 2026
newspaper
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
groups
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
2 linked entities
gavel
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Western District of Washington, a federal district court in WA.
The newest docket activity we have is a motion dated May 04, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
chronic
Updated 1 day, 22 hours ago
The Story So Far
USA v. Braga is an active criminal matter in Western District of Washington under docket 22-cr-00169.
The case is currently organized around Criminal charges and procedural posture, Charge status, plea posture, and court supervision, Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 4, 2026, the docket recorded a motion: The court referred motions in the case of USA v. Braga (2:22-cr-00169-1) to a magistrate judge. This means that the main judge has delegated the responsibility of handling the motions to a subordinate judge.
The magistrate judge will now review and decide on.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest motion produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
smart_toy
Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline.
How we verify our work.
update What Changed This Week
1 event
edit_note
Motion
5 days ago
The court referred motions in the case of USA v. Braga (2:22-cr-00169-1) to a magistrate judge. This means that the main judge has delegated the responsibility of handling the motions to a subordinate judge. The magistrate judge will now re
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Motions Referred
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
About This Court
Western District of Washington (W.D. Wash.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, WA.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
1 event
edit_note
Motion
May 4, 2026
2:22-cr-00169-1 USA v. Braga
The court referred motions in the case of USA v. Braga (2:22-cr-00169-1) to a magistrate judge. This means that the main judge has delegated the responsibility of handling the motions to a subordinate judge. The magistrate judge will now review and decide on the motions.
Advertisement
newspaper
1 article
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
5 hours, 2 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.